Back

Low-Cost, Label-Free Blue Light Cystoscopy through Digital Staining of White Light Cystoscopy Videos

Chang, S.; Wintergerst, G. A.; Carlson, C. J.; Yin, H.; Scarpato, K. R.; Luckenbaugh, A. N.; Chang, S.; Kolouri, S.; Bowden, A. K.

2024-03-22 urology
10.1101/2024.03.21.24304656 medRxiv
Show abstract

Bladder cancer is 10th most common malignancy and carries the highest treatment cost among all cancers. The high cost of bladder cancer treatment stems from its high recurrence rate, which necessitates frequent surveillance. White light cystoscopy (WLC), the standard of care surveillance tool to examine the bladder for lesions, has limited sensitivity for early-stage bladder cancer. Blue light cystoscopy (BLC) utilizes a fluorescent dye to induce contrast in cancerous regions, improving the sensitivity of detection by 43%. Nevertheless, the added cost and lengthy administration time of the dye limits the availability of BLC for surveillance. Here, we report the first demonstration of digital staining on clinical endoscopy videos collected with standard-of-care clinical equipment to convert WLC images to accurate BLC-like images. We introduce key pre-processing steps to circumvent color and brightness variations in clinical datasets needed for successful model performance; the results show excellent qualitative and quantitative agreement of the digitally stained WLC (dsWLC) images with ground truth BLC images as measured through staining accuracy analysis and color consistency assessment. In short, dsWLC can provide the fluorescent contrast needed to improve the detection sensitivity of bladder cancer, thereby increasing the accessibility of BLC contrast for bladder cancer surveillance use without the cost and time burden associated with the dye and specialized equipment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
5.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.6%
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
10
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
29
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%