Back

Effect of copper mill waste material on benthic invertebrates and zooplankton diversity and abundance in Lake Superior beaches

Larson, J. H.; Lowe, M. R.; Bailey, S. W.; Bell, A. H.; Cleveland, D. M.

2024-03-23 ecology
10.1101/2024.03.20.585947 bioRxiv
Show abstract

From 1900 to 1932 a copper (Cu) mill operated near Gay, Michigan, along the eastern shore of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Lake Superior, Michigan) and discharged waste material (stamp sands [SS]) to a nearby beach. These SS escaped containment structures and have been redeposited by wave action along the beaches in northern Grand Traverse Bay and onto Buffalo Reef, an important spawning area for native fish. Newly hatched fish move into nearby beach habitats where they grow during their first summer. Juvenile fish initially consume zooplankton before switching to benthic invertebrates once they are large enough. SS contain metals (especially Cu) that are toxic to many invertebrate taxa, and studies have observed few benthic taxa in areas covered by SS. We sampled the invertebrate community from four Lake Whitefish nursery areas: one near Buffalo Reef with high SS, one south of the Traverse River with moderate SS, one in nearby Little Traverse Bay with little SS, and a beach [~]58 km away with no SS (Big Bay). We also resampled the benthos at sites that had been sampled as part of an earlier Grand Traverse Bay study. Buffalo Reef (high SS) had fewer benthic taxa, and less density of several taxa than Little Traverse Bay (little SS), especially benthic copepods. All beaches had comparable zooplankton diversity, but the abundance was [~]2 orders of magnitude lower at Buffalo Reef (high SS) than other beaches. Cu and several other metals were elevated at beaches with more SS. We found support for associations between benthic density and diversity with depth (positive effect) and Cu concentration (negative effect). Cu concentration was a better predictor of declines in benthic invertebrate abundance and diversity than SS. We also observed that the relationship between Cu concentration and SS was non-linear, and highly variable. For example, 149 mg Cu/kg dry weight sediment is a consensus toxicity threshold used in the literature, but the prediction interval around that concentration from our model is 26-851 mg Cu/kg dry weight. A better predictive model of this relationship would be beneficial to develop to understand what level of SS reduction would prevent Cu impacts on invertebrates.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.6%
3
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.6%
4
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
17
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
Freshwater Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%