Back

SUC2 sucrose transporter is required for leaf apoplasmic sucrose levels. Consequences for phloem loading strategies

Vilaine, F.; Bill, L.; Le Hir, R.; Bellini, C.; Dinant, S.

2024-03-23 plant biology
10.1101/2024.03.20.585851 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Summary * The SUC/SUT sucrose transporters belong to a family of active H+/sucrose symporters, with a role of SUC2 in active apoplasmic phloem loading to drive long-distance phloem transport of sucrose in Arabidopsis. However, the cooperation with the symplasmic pathway for phloem loading remains unclear. * In this study, we explored the consequences of reducing either apoplasmic or symplasmic pathways of phloem loading. We compared a series of lines with modified expression of SUC2 gene, and we analyzed the effects on plant growth, sugar accumulation in source and sink organs, phloem transport, and gene expression. * Our data revealed that a modified expression of SUC2 impacted apoplasmic sucrose levels in source leaves but did not impact phloem transport, as might be expected, while increasing foliar storage of carbohydrates. This response differed from lines in which symplasmic communications between phloem cells was disrupted by the over-expression of a plasmodesmata-associated protein, NHL26. * Altogether, our studies indicate an unexpected effect of SUC2 for apoplasmic sucrose levels in source leaves, together with SUC1, and suggest a feedback regulation on foliar storage. This data sheds new light on the interplay between symplasmic and apoplasmic pathways for sugar loading and the consequences on leaf water flows. Summary statementThe mechanisms that coordinate apoplasmic and symplasmic loading pathways, and their effects on foliar carbon storage, remain largely unexplored. Surprisingly, the sucrose transporter SUC2 plays a significant role in maintaining sucrose levels in the apoplasm, shedding light on how apoplasmic sugar levels and water flows can interact for phloem loading.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.2%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
4
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
7
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%