Back

Mixed Methods Family Centered Study of Pain Experience in Non-Hispanic White and Black Children

Kumar, J.; Atkinson, D.; Chima, A.; McLaughlin, L.; Parikh, R.; Mende-Siedlecki, P.; Mitchell, M.; Chidambaran, V.

2024-03-22 pain medicine
10.1101/2024.03.20.24304546 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesAlthough racial disparities in pediatric pain have been described, family-centered research is lacking. This mixed-methods study aimed to understand race-specific factors impacting acute pain experiences in Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Black (NHB) children. MethodsNHW and NHB children (aged 8-17) (n=19 each) with a recent acute pain experience, and their caregivers were recruited. The following domains were assessed in children (deprivation, ethnic identity, pain, psychosocial, pain coping, resilience) and caregivers (education, income, Racial and Ethnic Microaggressions Scale (REMS), Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs), Adult Response to Childs Symptoms). Questionnaire measures were compared between groups using simple statistical tests. Fifteen dyads participated in focus groups. Thematic codes underlying pain experiences were identified. ResultsNHB children had similar pain/psychosocial characteristics but differed in ethnic identity (2.7 (0.5) vs. 2.2 (0.5); P=.002), deprivation index (0.4 (IQR 0.3-0.5) vs. 0.3 (IQR 0.2, 0.3), P=.007) and pain coping efficacy (8.6 (0.4) vs. 9.8 (0.5), P=.045) from NHW children. NHB caregivers scored higher on REMS sub-scales, ACEs (0 (0,1) vs 0 (0,0); P=.02) and Protection (1.9 (0.6) vs. 1.6 (0.5); P=.03) behaviors in response to child pain. NHB and NHW participants endorsed satisfaction with pain experiences, opioid avoidance, and stoicism. Unlike NHW participants, NHB reported barriers related to trust, discrimination, and access. ConclusionsRacial differences in acute pain experiences suggest healthcare providers need to reinforce trust and consider underlying cultural and pain coping differences when treating pain in NHB children. Findings emphasize that family-centered and systems-based approaches are important for equity in pediatric pain. Article SummaryThis mixed-methods family-centered study identifies common themes, systems-related barriers and pain coping efficacy differences underlying pain experiences of Black and White children. Whats Known on This SubjectInequities exist in post-surgical pain and pain management of Black and White children. What This Study AddsFamily perspectives regarding pain experience of NHB and NHW children highlight inter-group differences in stressors, barriers, pain coping and parent responses to childs pain. Findings underscore the importance of family engagement and addressing systemic barriers to improve pain equity. Contributors StatementChidambaran conceptualized and designed the study, conducted focus groups, coordinated and supervised data collection, analyses, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Mitchell conceptualized and designed the study, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Kumar and Atkinson conducted subject recruitment, collected data, drafted the initial manuscript, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and designed the data collection instruments in REDCap, and analyzed the data. McLaughlin, Parikh and Chima participated in conduct of focus groups and maintained regulatory aspects of the study, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript Mende-Siedlecki helped design the study, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Data Sharing StatementDeidentified individual participant data (including data dictionaries) will be made available, in addition to study protocols, the statistical analysis plan, and the informed consent form. The data will be made available upon publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be submitted to vidya.chidambaran@cchmc.org.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.