Machine learning methods applied to classify complex diseases using genomic data
Arnal Segura, M.; Bini, G.; Krithara, A.; Paliouras, G.; Tartaglia, G. G.
Show abstract
Complex diseases pose challenges in disease prediction due to their multifactorial and polygenic nature. In this work, we explored the prediction of two complex diseases, multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimers disease (AD), using machine learning (ML) methods and genomic data from UK Biobank. Different ML methods were applied, including logistic regressions (LR), gradient boosting decision trees (GB), extremely randomized trees (ET), random forest (RF), feedforward networks (FFN), and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The primary goal of this research was to investigate the variability of ML models in classifying complex diseases based on genomic risk. LR was the most robust method across folds and diseases, whereas deep learning methods (FFN and CNN) exhibited high variability. When comparing the performance of polygenic risk scores (PRS) with ML methods, PRS consistently performed at an average level. However, PRS still offers several practical advantages over ML methods. Despite implementing feature selection techniques to exclude non-informative and correlated predictors, the performance of ML models did not improve significantly, underscoring the ability of ML methods to achieve optimal performance even in the presence of correlated features due to linkage disequilibrium. Upon applying explainability tools to extract information about the genomic features contributing most to the classification task, the results confirmed the polygenicity of MS. The prevalence of HLA gene annotations among the top genomic features on chromosome 6 aligns with their significance in the context of MS. Overall, the highest-prioritized genomic variants were identified as expression or splicing quantitative trait loci (eQTL or sQTL) located in non-coding regions within or near genes associated with the immune response and MS. In summary, this research offers deeper insights into how ML models discern genomic patterns related to complex diseases.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AITeQ: A machine learning framework for Alzheimer's prediction using a distinctive 5-gene signature 92%
- kTWAS: integrating kernel-machine with transcriptome-wide association studies improves statistical power and reveals novel genes 91%
- Genome wide association neural networks (GWANN) identify novel genes linked to family history of Alzheimer’s disease in the UK Biobank 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic landscape of rare autoinflammatory disease variants in Qatar and Middle Eastern populations through the integration of whole-genome and exome datasets 92%
- Module analysis using single-patient differential expression signatures improve the power of association study for Alzheimer's disease 91%
- Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium in the Large Scale Genomic Sequencing Era 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing resting-state EEG oscillatory and aperiodic activity in neurodegenerative diseases: A multicentric study 90%
- Alzheimer Disease Knowledge Graph Enhances Knowledge Discovery and Disease Prediction 90%
- A Comprehensive Targeted Panel of 295 Genes: Unveiling Key Disease Initiating and Transformative Biomarkers in MultipleMyeloma 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- DReAmocracy: A Method to Capitalize on Prior Drug Discovery Efforts to Highlight Candidate Drugs for Repurposing 91%
- Genetic Networks of Alzheimer’s Disease, Aging and Longevity in Humans 90%
- Multi-ancestry transcriptome-wide association studies of cognitive function, white matter hyperintensity, and Alzheimer’s disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.