Exploring the Psychological, Social, and Human Rights Dynamics and Consequences of COVID-19 Control Measures: A Systematic Review
Spasojevic, D.
Show abstract
This systematic review explores the social and psychological dynamics and consequences of COVID-19 control measures and their implications for human rights. Through a lens of social psychology, the review considers factors such as social influence, obedience, perceived control, social comparison, cognitive dissonance, propaganda, surveillance, fearmongering, incentives, coercion, persuasion, censorship, obfuscation, isolation, and rewards and punishment. By analyzing the influence of these factors on individuals and group responses to the pandemic and the manipulation of social and psychological dynamics by institutions to shape compliance, this review provides insights into the determinants that drive adherence to control measures and their negative consequences. The findings of the 13 selected studies contribute to understanding the multifaceted factors that influence compliance and inform the development of effective public health interventions to avoid consequences. The review emphasizes the importance of upholding human rights during the implementation of control measures, given the reported violations across the world. By providing insights to policymakers, politicians, health practitioners, and researchers, this review enables the formulation of strategies that promote public health while respecting human and individual rights and well-being. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the social and psychological dynamics, human rights, and implications of COVID-19 control measures, providing valuable insights for future interventions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 96%
- Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia 96%
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 96%
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 95%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A protocol for a systematic critical realist synthesis of school mindfulness interventions designed to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing 94%
- SDG5 ‘Gender Equality’ and the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries 94%
- Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: A systematic review and meta-ethnography 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 95%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 94%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 95%
- Global Measurement of Physical Intimate Partner Violence to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5 94%
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.