Study Protocol for the Artificial Intelligence-Driven Evaluation of Structural Heart Diseases Using Wearable Electrocardiogram (ID-SHD)
Aminorroaya, A.; Dhingra, L. S.; Pedroso Camargos, A.; Vasisht Shankar, S.; Khunte, A.; Sangha, V.; McNamara, R. L.; Haynes, N.; Oikonomou, E. K.; Khera, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionPortable devices capable of electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition have the potential to enhance structural heart disease (SHD) management by enabling early detection through artificial intelligence-ECG (AI-ECG) algorithms. However, the performance of these AI algorithms for identifying SHD in a real-world screening setting is unknown. To address this gap, we aim to evaluate the validity of our wearable-adapted AI algorithm, which has been previously developed and validated for detecting SHD from single-lead portable ECGs in patients undergoing routine echocardiograms in the Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH). Research Methods and AnalysisThis is the protocol for a cross-sectional study in the echocardiographic laboratories of YNHH. The study will enroll 585 patients referred for outpatient transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as part of their routine clinical care. Patients expressing interest in participating in the study will undergo a screening interview, followed by enrollment upon meeting eligibility criteria and providing informed consent. During their routine visit, patients will undergo a 1-lead ECG with two devices - one with an Apple Watch and the second with another portable 1-lead ECG device. With participant consent, these 1-lead ECG data will be linked to participant demographic and clinical data recorded in the YNHH electronic health records (EHR). The study will assess the performance of the AI-ECG algorithm in identifying SHD, including left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), valvular disease and severe left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), by comparing the algorithms results with data obtained from TTE, which is the established gold standard for diagnosing SHD. Ethics and DisseminationAll patient EHR data required for assessing eligibility and conducting the AI-ECG will be accessed through secure servers approved for protected health information. Data will be maintained on secure, encrypted servers for a minimum of five years after the publication of our findings in a peer-reviewed journal, and any unanticipated adverse events or risks will be reported by the principal investigator to the Yale Institutional Review Board, which has reviewed and approved this protocol (Protocol Number: 2000035532).
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 97%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 93%
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- Integrating remote monitoring into heart failure patients’ care regimen: A pilot study 94%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: benchmarking open-source algorithms 95%
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 94%
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biometric Contrastive Learning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning from Electrocardiographic Images 93%
- A Comparative Analysis of Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models For Automated Echocardiography Report Analysis 93%
- Observer: Creation of a Novel Multimodal Dataset for Outpatient Care Research 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.