Cognitive Assessment With Cognivue Clarity: Psychometric Properties And Enhanced Normative Ranges In A Diverse Population
galvin, j. E.; Chang, L.-C.; Estes, P.; Harris, H. M.; Fung, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundDetecting cognitive impairment in clinical practice is challenging as most instruments do not perform well in diverse samples of older adults. These same instruments are often used for eligibility into clinical trials making it difficult to recruit minoritized adults into Alzheimers disease (AD) studies. Cognivue Clarity(R) is an FDA-cleared computerized cognitive screening platform using adaptive psychophysics to detect cognitive impairment. ObjectiveTest the ability of Cognivue Clarity to detect cognitive impairment in a diverse community sample compared with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). MethodsThis study enrolled 452 participants across 6 US study sites and completed both Cognivue Clarity device and RBANS. Psychometric properties and exploratory factor analysis of Cognivue Clarity were explored and comparisons against RBANS across different age, sex, education, and ethnoracial groups were conducted. ResultsParticipants had a mean age of 47.9{+/-}16.1 years (range: 18-85), 63.6% were female, 45.9% had <12 years of education, 31.2% were African American and 9.2% were Hispanic. Cognivue Clarity had strong internal consistency, test-retest and minimal practice effects. A 4-factor structure (Memory, Attention, Visuomotor, and Discrimination) had excellent goodness of fit. Normalizing age effects improved performance. Race and education effects were similar to those seen with RBANS. Cognivue Clarity had strong correlation with RBANS. ConclusionsOur study supports the use of Cognivue Clarity as an easy-to-use, brief, and valid cognitive assessment that can be used for identifying individuals with likely cognitive impairment in the clinical setting and those who could be candidates for AD research studies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people 97%
- The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment 96%
- The negative impact of COVID-19 on working memory revealed using a rapid online quiz 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 96%
- Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite 95%
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mild Behavioral Impairment and Subjective Cognitive Decline predict Mild Cognitive Impairment 95%
- Effect of cognitive reserve on physiological measures of cognitive workload in older adults with cognitive impairments 94%
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High frequency post-pause word choices and task-dependent speech behavior characterize connected speech in individuals with mild cognitive impairment 95%
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 94%
- Sex Differences in Cognitive Performance in Alzheimer's Disease: Insights from the ADAS-Cog-13 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report 96%
- Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG with an interactive assessment tool 93%
- COVCOG 2: Cognitive and Memory Deficits in Long COVID: A Second Publication from the COVID and Cognition Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.