Back

Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of peptide-based degraders enables targeted protein degradation

Ghosal, S.; Robertus, C.; Wang, J.; Chan, H. W.; Alamgir, A.; Almonte, J.; Alabi, C. A.

2024-03-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.03.17.584721 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of small molecule-based degraders against intracellular protein targets is a rapidly growing field that is hindered by the limited availability of high-quality small molecule ligands that bind to the target of interest. Despite the feasibility of designing peptide ligands against any protein target, peptide-based degraders still face significant obstacles such as, limited serum stability and poor cellular internalization. To overcome these obstacles, we repurposed lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations to facilitate the delivery of Peptide-based proteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PepTACs). Our investigations reveal robust intracellular transport of PepTAC-LNPs across various clinically relevant human cell lines. Our studies also underscore the critical nature of the linker and hydrophobic E3 binding ligand for efficient LNP packaging and transport. We demonstrate the clinical utility of this strategy by engineering PepTACs targeting two critical transcription factors, {beta}-catenin and CREPT (cell-cycle-related and expression-elevated protein in tumor), involved in the Wnt-signalling pathway. The PepTACs induced target-specific protein degradation and led to a significant reduction in Wnt-driven gene expression and cancer cell proliferation. Mouse biodistribution studies revealed robust accumulation of PepTAC-LNPs in the spleen and liver, among other organs, and PepTACs designed against {beta}-catenin and formulated in LNPs showed a reduction in {beta}-catenin levels in the liver. Our findings demonstrate that LNPs can be formulated to encapsulate PepTACs, thus enabling robust delivery and potent intracellular protein degradation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.