Back

Training-free Design of Deep Networks as Ensembles of Clinical Experts

Wu, T.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.

2024-03-18 health informatics
10.1101/2024.03.17.24304438 medRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as deep learning hold tremendous potential for improving clinical practice. However, clinical data complexity and the need for extensive specialized knowledge represent major challenges in the current, human-driven model design. Moreover, as human interpretation of a clinical problem is inherently encoded in the model, the conventional single model paradigm is subjective and cannot fully capture the prediction uncertainty. Here, we present a fast and accurate framework for automated clinical deep learning, TEACUP (training-free assembly as clinical uncertainty predictor). The core of TEACUP is a newly developed metric that faithfully characterizes the quality of deep networks without incurring any cost for training of these networks. When compared to conventional, training-based approaches, TEACUP reduces computation costs by more than 50% while achieving improved performance across distinct clinical tasks. This efficiency allows TEACUP to create ensembles of expert AI models, contributing to recommendations in clinical practice by mimicking the approach of using multiple human experts when interpreting medical data. By combining multiple perspectives, TEACUP provides more robust predictions and uncertainty quantification, paving the way for more reliable clinical AI.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.5%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
4
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
5
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
6
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
10
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
12
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
14
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%