Back

Mental Health Trends in India from 2020 to 2022: Association with Financial Stress, Food Insecurity, and COVID-19-related Illness Concerns

Yang, Y.; Sun, A.; Zimmermann, L.; Mukherjee, B.

2024-03-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.03.17.24304396 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study examines the impact of pandemic-related worries on mental health in the Indian general adult population from 2020 to 2022. Using data from the Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey (N = 2,576,174 respondents aged[≥] 18 years in India; an average weekly sample size of around 25,000), it explores the associations between worry variables (namely financial stress, food insecurity, and COVID-19-related health worries) and self-reported symptoms of depression and nervousness. The statistical analysis was conducted using complete cases only (N = 747,996). Our analysis used survey-weighted models, focusing on the three pandemic-related worries as the exposures, while also adjusting for various other covariates, including demographics and calendar time. The study finds significant associations between these worries and mental health outcomes, with financial stress being the most significant factor affecting both depression (adjusted odds ratio: 2.36, 95% confidence interval: [2.27, 2.46]) and nervousness (adjusted odds ratio: 1.91, 95% confidence interval: [1.81, 2.01]) during the first phase of the study period (June 27, 2020, to May 19, 2021). The fully adjusted models also identify additional factors related to mental health, including age, gender, residential status, geographical region, occupation, and education. Moreover, the research highlights that males and urban residents had higher odds ratios for self-reported mental health problems regarding the worry variables than females and rural residents, respectively. Furthermore, the study reveals a rise in the prevalence of self-reported depression and nervousness and their association with COVID-19-related health worries during the lethal second wave of the pandemic in May 2021 compared to the onset of the pandemic. This study shows that social media platforms like Facebook can deploy surveys to a large number of participants globally and can be useful tools in capturing mental health trends and uncovering associations during a public health crisis.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
9
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
12
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
14
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
18
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
19
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%