Back

A Survey on Optimization and Machine -learning-based Fair Decision Making in Healthcare

Chen, Z.; Marrero, W. J.

2024-03-18 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.03.16.24304403 medRxiv
Show abstract

The unintended biases introduced by optimization and machine learning (ML) models are a topic of great interest to medical researchers and professionals. Bias in healthcare decisions can cause patients from vulnerable populations (e.g., racially minoritized, low-income, or living in rural areas) to have lower access to resources and inferior outcomes, thus exacerbating societal unfairness. In this systematic literature review, we present a structured overview of the literature regarding fair decision making in healthcare until April 2024. After screening 801 unique references, we identified 114 articles within the scope of our review. In our review, we comprehensively examine fair decision-making methodologies in healthcare by systematically identifying and categorizing biases within both data and models. Initially, we elucidate existing bias within healthcare decision making. Then, we present a range of fairness metrics drawn from different use cases, followed by analyzing and classifying bias mitigation strategies into pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing techniques. We provide a broad conceptual overview and practical illustrations of each approach. Additionally, we examine emerging bias mitigation technologies that, though not yet applied in healthcare, show substantial promise for future integration. Our review aims to increase awareness of fairness in healthcare decision making and facilitate the selection of appropriate approaches under varying scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
5
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%