A Survey on Optimization and Machine -learning-based Fair Decision Making in Healthcare
Chen, Z.; Marrero, W. J.
Show abstract
The unintended biases introduced by optimization and machine learning (ML) models are a topic of great interest to medical researchers and professionals. Bias in healthcare decisions can cause patients from vulnerable populations (e.g., racially minoritized, low-income, or living in rural areas) to have lower access to resources and inferior outcomes, thus exacerbating societal unfairness. In this systematic literature review, we present a structured overview of the literature regarding fair decision making in healthcare until April 2024. After screening 801 unique references, we identified 114 articles within the scope of our review. In our review, we comprehensively examine fair decision-making methodologies in healthcare by systematically identifying and categorizing biases within both data and models. Initially, we elucidate existing bias within healthcare decision making. Then, we present a range of fairness metrics drawn from different use cases, followed by analyzing and classifying bias mitigation strategies into pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing techniques. We provide a broad conceptual overview and practical illustrations of each approach. Additionally, we examine emerging bias mitigation technologies that, though not yet applied in healthcare, show substantial promise for future integration. Our review aims to increase awareness of fairness in healthcare decision making and facilitate the selection of appropriate approaches under varying scenarios.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data 95%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 94%
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital Length of Stay: A cross-Specialty Analysis and Beta-Geometric Model 95%
- Identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients using machine learning 94%
- Time-to-event estimation of birth year prevalence trends: a method to enable investigating the etiology of childhood disorders including autism 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
- Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments 93%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo methods for the calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information 93%
- Pricing Treatments Cost-Effectively When They Have Multiple Indications: Not Just a Simple Threshold Analysis 91%
- Evaluation of Contact-Tracing Policies Against the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Austria– An Agent-Based Simulation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.