Back

MetagenomicKG: a knowledge graph for metagenomic applications

Ma, C.; Liu, S.; Koslicki, D.

2024-03-15 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.03.14.585056 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationThe sheer volume and variety of genomic content within microbial communities makes metagenomics a field rich in biomedical knowledge. To traverse these complex communities and their vast unknowns, metagenomic studies often depend on distinct reference databases, such as the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB), the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC), for various analytical purposes. These databases are crucial for genetic and functional annotation of microbial communities. Nevertheless, the inconsistent nomenclature or identifiers of these databases present challenges for effective integration, representation, and utilization. Knowledge graphs (KGs) offer an appropriate solution by organizing biological entities and their interrelations into a cohesive network. The graph structure not only facilitates the unveiling of hidden patterns but also enriches our biological understanding with deeper insights. Despite KGs having shown potential in various biomedical fields, their application in metagenomics remains underexplored. ResultsWe present MetagenomicKG, a novel knowledge graph specifically tailored for metagenomic analysis. MetagenomicKG integrates taxonomic, functional, and pathogenesis-related information from widely used databases, and further links these with established biomedical knowledge graphs to expand biological connections. Through several use cases, we demonstrate its utility in enabling hypothesis generation regarding the relationships between microbes and diseases, generating sample-specific graph embeddings, and providing robust pathogen prediction. Availability and ImplementationThe source code and technical details for constructing the MetagenomicKG and reproducing all analyses are available at Github: https://github.com/KoslickiLab/MetagenomicKG. We also host a Neo4j instance: http://mkg.cse.psu.edu:7474 for accessing and querying this graph. Contactdmk333@psu.edu Supplementary informationavailable at Bioinformatics online.

Published in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.