Quantifying Oxygen Demand by Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 at a Large Safety-Net Hospital Using Multiple Methodologies
Vanderburg, S.; Law, T.; Shete, P. B.; Riviello, E. D.; Hendrickson, C. M.; Burns, G. D.; Jain, V.; Lipnick, M. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many facilities worldwide struggled to forecast oxygen demand, which often exceeded oxygen supply to the detriment of patient care. Accurate estimates of oxygen demand by patients with COVID-19 are scarce, and proposed estimation methods have not been fully evaluated or implemented. To address this knowledge gap, oxygen demand by COVID-19 patients was calculated at a large safety-net hospital in the United States using patient consumption (demand) data, oxygen procurement (supply) data, and modeled data with a novel calculator tool. MethodsData were extracted from electronic medical records of patients admitted with COVID-19 to Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG) from March 2020 to March 2022, including every recorded peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement as well as oxygen delivery device(s) and settings. Total patient oxygen consumption was calculated as the sum of oxygen delivery amounts for each recorded time interval during hospitalization. Oxygen delivery amounts were calculated using delivery device-specific formulas. Patient and treatment-specific factors which may impact oxygen demand were also reported. For comparison, oxygen procurement logs from the study period were reviewed to estimate supply consumed, and the Oxygencalculator.com tool was used to model oxygen demand using an experimental patient population of the same size. ResultsIn total, 282,095 time points from 1,076 patients were analyzed. Two-thirds of patients received oxygen, of which 24.3% received high-flow oxygen (HFO) therapy and 16.0% received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at some point. In-hospital mortality was 7.5% overall, 10.8% for patients who received oxygen, and 28.3% for patients who received IMV. The median (IQR) duration of oxygen therapy was 3.1 (0.8-8.9) days, mean (SD) oxygen flow was 5.6 (5.0) liters per minute (LPM), and mean (SD) total volume of oxygen delivered was 180,115 (510,330) liters (L) per hospitalization. Both the supply- and model-based methods overestimated oxygen consumption compared to demand estimated from patient data. ConclusionsThis study represents one of the largest cohorts of patients with COVID-19 for which oxygen demand has been calculated, including patient clinical characteristics which may help explain variations in oxygen demand. Moreover, oxygen demand was quantified using a methodology that could be applied in any setting.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 94%
- Cardiovascular disease and severe hypoxemia associated with higher rates of non-invasive respiratory support failure in COVID-19 94%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a predictive model for critical illness in adult patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 95%
- ICU Outcomes and Survival in Patients with Severe COVID-19 in the Largest Health Care System in Central Florida 94%
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 94%
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 93%
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 93%
- Performance of popular pulse oximeters compared with simultaneous arterial oxygen saturation or clinical-grade pulse oximetry: a cross-sectional validation study in intensive care patients 92%
- The Impact Of The COVID-19 Pandemic On Non-COVID-19 Community-Acquired Pneumonia, A Retrospective Cohort Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.