Leveraging cancer mutation data to predict the pathogenicity of germline missense variants
Haque, B.; Cheerie, D.; Pan, A.; Curtis, M.; Nalpathamkalam, T.; Nguyen, J.; Salhab, C.; Thiruvahindrapura, B.; Zhang, J.; Couse, M.; Hartley, T.; Morrow, M. M.; Price, E. M.; Walker, S.; Malkin, D.; Roth, F. P.; Costain, G.
Show abstract
Innovative and easy-to-implement strategies are needed to improve the pathogenicity assessment of rare germline missense variants. Somatic cancer driver mutations identified through large-scale tumor sequencing studies often impact genes that are also associated with rare Mendelian disorders. The use of cancer mutation data to aid in the interpretation of germline missense variants, regardless of whether the gene is associated with a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome or a non-cancer-related developmental disorder, has not been systematically assessed. We extracted putative cancer driver missense mutations from the Cancer Hotspots database and annotated them as germline variants, including presence/absence and classification in ClinVar. We trained two supervised learning models (logistic regression and random forest) to predict variant classifications of germline missense variants in ClinVar using Cancer Hotspot data (training dataset). The performance of each model was evaluated with an independent test dataset generated in part from searching public and private genome-wide sequencing datasets from [~]1.5 million individuals. Of the 2,447 cancer mutations, 691 corresponding germline variants had been previously classified in ClinVar: 426 (61.6%) as likely pathogenic/pathogenic, 261 (37.8%) as uncertain significance, and 4 (0.6%) as likely benign/benign. The odds ratio for a likely pathogenic/pathogenic classification in ClinVar was 28.3 (95% confidence interval: 24.2-33.1, p < 0.001), compared with all other germline missense variants in the same 216 genes. Both supervised learning models showed high correlation with pathogenicity assessments in the training dataset. There was high area under precision-recall curve values of 0.847 and 0.829 for logistic regression and random forest models, respectively, when applied to the test dataset. With the use of cancer and germline datasets and supervised learning techniques, our study shows that cancer mutation data can be leveraged to improve the interpretation of germline missense variation potentially causing rare Mendelian disorders. AUTHOR SUMMARYOur study introduces an approach to improve the interpretation of rare genetic variation, specifically missense variants that can alter proteins and cause disease. We found that published evidence from somatic cancer sequencing studies may be relevant to understanding the impact of the same variant in the context of rare inherited (Mendelian) disorders. By using widely available datasets, we noted that many cancer driver mutations have also been observed as rare germline variants associated with inherited disorders. This intersection led us to employ machine learning techniques to assess how cancer mutation data can predict the pathogenicity of germline variants. We trained machine learning models and tested them on a separate dataset curated by searching public and private genome-wide sequencing data from over a million participants. Our models were able to successfully identify pathogenic genetic changes, demonstrating strong performance in predicting disease-causing variants. This study highlights that cancer mutation data can enhance the interpretation of rare missense variants, aiding in the diagnosis and understanding of rare diseases. Integrating this approach into current genetic classification frameworks could be beneficial, and opens new avenues for leveraging existing cancer research to benefit broader genetic research and diagnostics for rare genetic conditions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria) 96%
- Accurate assignment of disease liability to genetic variants using only population data 95%
- Evaluation of Bayesian Classification Framework on the Variant Classification of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Genes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracting and calibrating evidence of variant pathogenicity from population biobank data 96%
- Availability of benign missense variant “truthsets” for validation of functional assays: current status and a novel systematic approach 96%
- Advanced variant classification framework reduces the false positive rate of predicted loss of function (pLoF) variants in population sequencing data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-read genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders 95%
- Characteristics predicting reduced penetrance variants in the high-risk cancer predisposition gene TP53 94%
- Identification and validation of novel candidate risk genes in endocytic vesicular trafficking associated with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide prediction of pathogenic gain- and loss-of-function variants from ensemble learning of diverse feature set 95%
- A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. 95%
- MetaRNN: Differentiating Rare Pathogenic and Rare Benign Missense SNVs and InDels Using Deep Learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort 95%
- The landscape of driver mutations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 94%
- Distinguishing benign from pathogenic duplications involving GPR101 and VGLL1-adjacent enhancers in the clinical setting with the bioinformatic tool POSTRE 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.