Back

Mean exercise torque is a critical factor influencing neuromuscular fatigability induced by exhausting contractions

Lebesque, L.; Scaglioni, G.; Martin, A.

2024-03-11 physiology
10.1101/2024.03.06.583664 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PURPOSETo get a more detailed description of neuromuscular fatigability, maximal torque sustainability (i.e., the ability to maintain a high torque level) can be assessed in addition to the classically used maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Since this parameter appears to be affected by mean exercise torque (MET), the present study aims to examine the relationship between MET and neuromuscular fatigability induced by exhausting contractions. METHODSThirteen participants sustained a plantar flexors MVC for 1 min (MVC1- MIN) before and after exhausting exercises designed to produce a similar MET (30% MVC), and following a 10-min rest period. Exercises consisted of intermittent (INT), continuous (CON) or variable (continuous contraction alternating between moderate and low intensity, VAR) contractions performed until task failure. RESULTSAlthough the INT resulted in greater exercise duration and torque-time integral than CON and VAR, MVC similarly decreased after all exercises due to neural and muscular impairments. The torque loss during the MVC1-MIN increased after all exercises to a similar extent, mainly because of neural alterations. Contrary to MVC, the torque loss during the MVC1-MIN returned to baseline value after the recovery period. CONCLUSIONBy considering both maximal torque production and sustainability, INT, CON and VAR exercises, performed with identical mean torque and until exhaustion, led to a similar neuromuscular fatigability. Results confirm the independence of maximal torque production from the contraction pattern and support the impact of MET on maximal torque sustainability. The present findings are crucial to consider for the management of neuromuscular fatigability in both athletes and patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.6%
2
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
15
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
17
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
20
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%