Back

The microbiome of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria varies according to climate in Europe

Bogale, A. T.; Braun, M.; Bernhardt, J.; Zuehlke, D.; Schiefelbein, U.; Bog, M.; Scheidegger, C.; Zengerer, V.; Becher, D.; Grube, M.; Riedel, K.; Bengtsson, M. M.

2024-03-06 microbiology
10.1101/2024.03.06.583579 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Lobaria pulmonaria holobiont comprises algal, fungal, cyanobacterial, and bacterial components. We investigated L. pulmonarias bacterial microbiome in the adaptation of this ecologically sensitive lichen species to diverse climatic conditions. Our central hypothesis posited that microbiome composition and functionality aligns with continental-scale climatic parameters related to temperature and precipitation. We also tested the impact of short-term weather dynamics, sampling season, and algal/fungal genotypes on microbiome variation. Metaproteomics provided insights into compositional and functional changes within the microbiome. Climatic variables explained 41.64% of microbiome variation, surpassing the combined influence of local weather and sampling season at 31.63%. Notably, annual mean temperature and temperature seasonality emerged as significant climatic drivers. Microbiome composition correlated with algal, not fungal genotype, suggesting similar environmental recruitment for the algal partner and microbiome. Differential abundance analyses revealed distinct protein compositions in sub-atlantic lowland and alpine regions, indicating differential microbiome responses to contrasting environmental/climatic conditions. Proteins involved in oxidative and cellular stress were notably different. Our findings highlight microbiome plasticity in adapting to stable climates, with limited responsiveness to short-term fluctuations, offering new insights into climate adaptation in lichen symbiosis.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.