Back

Detection of pathogens and antimicrobial resistant genes from urine within 5 hours using Nanopore sequencing

Bellankimath, A. B.; Chapagain, C.; Branders, S.; Ali, J.; Wilson, R. C.; Johansen, T. E. B.; Ahmad, R.

2024-03-04 microbiology
10.1101/2024.03.04.582689 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeUrinary Tract Infection (UTI) is a prevalent global health concern accounting for 1-3% of primary healthcare visits. The current methods for UTI diagnosis have a high turnaround time of 3-5 days for pathogen identification and susceptibility testing. This work is a proof-of-concept study aimed at determining the detection limit by establishing a culture and amplification-free DNA extraction methodology from spiked urine samples followed by real-time Nanopore sequencing and data analysis. MethodsThis study first establishes an optical density culture-based method for spiking healthy urine samples with the six most prevalent uropathogens. Pathogens were spiked at two clinically significant concentrations of 103 and 105 CFU/ml. Three commercial DNA extraction kits were investigated based on the quantity of isolated DNA, average processing time, elution volume and the average cost incurred per extraction. The outperforming kit was used for direct DNA extraction and subsequent sequencing on MinION and Flongle flowcells. ResultsThe Blood and Tissue kit outperformed the other kits. All pathogens were identified at a concentration of 105 CFU/ml within ten minutes, and the corresponding AMR genes were detected within three hours of the sequencing start. The overall turnaround time including the DNA extraction and sequencing steps was five hours. Moreover, we also demonstrate that the identification of some pathogens and antibiotic-resistance genes was possible at a spike concentration of 103 CFU/mL. ConclusionThis study shows great promise toward reducing the time required for making an informed antibiotic administration from approximately 48 hours to five hours thereby reducing the number of empirical doses and saving lives.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.