Generation of guideline-based clinical decision trees in oncology using large language models
Miao, B. Y.; Rodriguez Almaraz, E.; Ashraf Ganjouei, A.; Suresh, A.; Zack, T.; Bravo, M.; Raghavendran, S.; Oskotsky, B.; Alaa, A.; Butte, A. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMolecular biomarkers play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and treatment of oncologic diseases but staying updated with the latest guidelines and research can be challenging for healthcare professionals and patients. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as MedPalm-2 and GPT-4, have emerged as potential tools to streamline biomedical information extraction, but their ability to summarize molecular biomarkers for oncologic disease subtyping remains unclear. Auto-generation of clinical nomograms from text guidelines could illustrate a new type of utility for LLMs. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, two LLMs, GPT-4 and Claude-2, were assessed for their ability to generate decision trees for molecular subtyping of oncologic diseases with and without expert-curated guidelines. Clinical evaluators assessed the accuracy of biomarker and cancer subtype generation, as well as validity of molecular subtyping decision trees across five cancer types: colorectal cancer, invasive ductal carcinoma, acute myeloid leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and diffuse glioma. ResultsBoth GPT-4 and Claude-2 "off the shelf" successfully produced clinical decision trees that contained valid instances of biomarkers and disease subtypes. Overall, GPT-4 and Claude-2 showed limited improvement in the accuracy of decision tree generation when guideline text was added. A Streamlit dashboard was developed for interactive exploration of subtyping trees generated for other oncologic diseases. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude-2 in aiding the summarization of molecular diagnostic guidelines in oncology. While effective in certain aspects, their performance highlights the need for careful interpretation, especially in zero-shot settings. Future research should focus on enhancing these models for more nuanced and probabilistic interpretations in clinical decision-making. The developed tools and methodologies present a promising avenue for expanding LLM applications in various medical specialties. Key Points- Large language models, such as GPT-4 and Claude-2, can generate clinical decision trees that summarize best-practice guidelines in oncology - Providing guidelines in the prompt query improves the accuracy of oncology biomarker and cancer subtype information extraction - However, providing guidelines in zero-shot settings does not significantly improve generation of clinical decision trees for either GPT-4 or Claude-2
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 94%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of natural language processing in cancer care: a systematic scoping review with narrative synthesis 93%
- Machine learning in the identification of prognostic DNA methylation biomarkers among patients with cancer: a systematic review of epigenome-wide studies 91%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 91%
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 91%
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria-based curation of a therapy-focused compendium to support treatment recommendations in precision oncology 92%
- Real-World Benchmarking and Validation of Foundation Model Transformers for Endometrial Cancer Subtyping from Histopathology 91%
- Annotation-Free Deep Learning for Predicting Gene Mutations from Whole Slide Images of Acute Myeloid Leukemia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.