The Emerging Applications of Synthetic Data in Neurosurgery Research and Practice: A Systematic Review
Bouras, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe integration of data-driven technologies into neurosurgery, particularly through the advent of synthetic data, marks a significant evolution in the field. This qualitative systematic review explores the impact of synthetic data on neurosurgical practices, including preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, postoperative care, training, and research. The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current applications, benefits, challenges, and future directions of synthetic data in neurosurgery. MethodsA thorough literature review was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings that detail the use of synthetic data in neurosurgery. The review prioritized studies offering qualitative evaluations, case studies, technological developments, and expert perspectives on synthetic datas integration into neurosurgical practices. Inclusion criteria were established to select studies that explicitly discuss the generation, utilization, and impact of synthetic data in the discipline. ResultsThe analysis reveals that synthetic data contributes significantly to neurosurgery, enhancing surgical planning precision, training simulation accuracy, and enabling personalized care. Identified benefits include addressing the scarcity of clinical data, maintaining patient privacy, and facilitating machine learning model development. Challenges such as ensuring data realism and variability, along with the integration of synthetic data into clinical workflows, were also identified. The review further highlights synthetic datas role in supporting collaborative research, navigating data sharing obstacles, and fostering innovation in neurosurgical methods and patient outcomes. ConclusionsSynthetic data presents a transformative opportunity for neurosurgery, addressing historical challenges and fostering advancements. Despite existing hurdles, its application across neurosurgical domains indicates a shift towards more personalized, precise, and effective patient care. Overcoming these challenges requires ongoing interdisciplinary cooperation and technological progress. The review emphasizes the necessity for standardized methodologies, ethical considerations, and a proactive stance to leverage synthetic datas potential fully in neurosurgical advancements.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Scene Understanding: A Systematic Review and Reporting Quality Meta-Analysis 91%
- A Clinical Neuroimaging Platform for Rapid, Automated Lesion Detection and Personalized Post-Stroke Outcome Prediction 90%
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and prospective real-time evaluation of a generalized system for in-clinic deployment and validation of machine learning models in radiology 92%
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 91%
- Assessing generalizability of an AI-based visual test for cervical cancer screening 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expert Surgeons and Deep Learning Models Can Predict the Outcome of Surgical Hemorrhage from One Minute of Video 92%
- Generating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models: a multifaceted approach to evaluation 90%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- GenECG: A synthetic image-based ECG dataset to augment artificial intelligence-enhanced algorithm development 89%
- ChatGPT in glioma patient adjuvant therapy decision making: ready to assume the role of a doctor in the tumour board? 88%
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 86%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.