Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model with Latent Space Regularization for CRISPR-Cas Protein Sequence Classification
Nammi, B.; Madugula, S. S.; Pujar, P.; Arachchige, V.; Lui, J.; Wang, S.
Show abstract
The discovery of the CRISPR-Cas system has significantly advanced genome editing, offering vast applications in medical treatments and life sciences research. Despite their immense potential, the existing CRISPR-Cas proteins still face challenges concerning size, delivery efficiency, and cleavage specificity. Addressing these challenges necessitates a deeper understanding of CRISPR-Cas proteins to enhance the design and discovery of novel Cas proteins for precision gene editing. In this study, we performed extensive deep-learning research on CRISPR-Cas proteins, aiming to develop a classification model capable of distinguishing CAS from non-CAS proteins, as well as discriminating sub-categories of CAS proteins, specifically CAS9 and CAS12. We developed two types of deep learning models: 1) a transformer encoder-based classification model, trained from scratch; and 2) a large protein language model fine-tuned on ProtBert, pre-trained on more than 200 million proteins. To boost learning efficiency for the model trained from scratch, we introduced a novel margin-based loss function to maximize inter-class separability and intra-class compactness in protein sequence embedding latent space of a transformer encoder. The experimental results show that the Fine-Tuned ProtBert-based (FTPB) classification model achieved accuracies of 99.06%, 94.42%, 96.80%, 97.57% for CAS9 vs. Non-CAS, CAS12 vs. Non-CAS, CAS9 vs. CAS12, and multi-class classification of CAS9 vs. CAS12 vs. Non-CAS, respectively. The Latent Space Regularized Max-Margin Transformer (LSRMT) model achieved classification accuracies of 99.81%, 99.81%, 99.06%, 99.27% for the same tasks, respectively. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed Max-Margin-based latent space regularization in enhancing model robustness and generalization capabilities. Remarkably, the LSRMT model, even when trained on a significantly smaller dataset, outperformed the fine-tuned state-of-the-art large protein model. The high classification accuracies achieved by the LSRMT model demonstrate its proficiency in identifying discriminative features of CAS proteins, marking a significant step towards advancing our understanding of CAS protein structures in future research endeavors.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISPR-DIPOFF: An Interpretable Deep LearningApproach for CRISPR Cas-9 Off-Target Prediction 97%
- PRIEST - Predicting viral mutations with immune escape capability of SARS-CoV-2 using temporal evolutionary information 96%
- Species-Agnostic Transfer Learning for Cross-species Transcriptomics Data Integration without Gene Orthology 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepHE: Accurately Predicting Human Essential Genes based on Deep Learning 95%
- A variational autoencoder trained with priors from canonical pathways increases the interpretability of transcriptome data 95%
- Deep6mA: a deep learning framework for exploring similar patterns in DNA N6-methyladenine sites across different species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-Head Attention-based U-Nets for Predicting Protein Domain Boundaries Using 1D Sequence Features and 2D Distance Maps 97%
- Predicting RNA Sequence-Structure Likelihood via Structure-Aware Deep Learning 96%
- Struct2Graph: A graph attention network for structure based predictions of protein-protein interactions 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- GenoM7GNet: An Efficient N7-methylguanosine Site Prediction Approach Based on a Nucleotide Language Model 97%
- Exploring the Knowledge of An Outstanding Protein to Protein Interaction Transformer 96%
- CPGL: Prediction of compound-protein interaction by integrating graph attention network with long short-term memory neural network 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.