Back

Thermal Characterization and Preclinical Validation of an Accessible, Carbon Dioxide-Based Cryotherapy System

Hu, Y.; Gordon, N.; Ogg, K.; Kraitchman, D. L.; Durr, N. J.; Surtees, B.

2024-03-04 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.03.01.582967 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To investigate the potential of an affordable cryotherapy device for accessible treatment of breast cancer, the performance of a novel carbon dioxide-based device was evaluated through both benchtop and in vivo canine models. This novel device was quantitatively compared to a commercial device that utilizes argon gas as the cryogen. The thermal behavior of each device was characterized through calorimetry and by measuring the temperature profiles of iceballs generated in tissue phantoms. A 45-minute treatment from the carbon dioxide device in a tissue phantom produced a 1.67 {+/-} 0.06 cm diameter lethal isotherm that was equivalent to a 7-minute treatment from the commercial argon-based device which produced a 1.53 {+/-} 0.15 cm diameter lethal isotherm. In vivo validation was performed with the carbon dioxide-based device in one spontaneously occurring canine mammary mass with two standard 10-minutes freezes. Following cryotherapy, this mass was surgically resected and analyzed for necrosis margins via histopathology. The histopathology margin of necrosis from the in vivo treatment with the carbon dioxide device at 14 days post cryoablation was 1.57 cm. While carbon dioxide gas has historically been considered an impractical cryogen due to its low working pressure and high boiling point, this study shows that carbon dioxide-based cryotherapy may be equivalent to conventional argon-based cryotherapy in the size of the ablation zone in a standard treatment time. The validation of the carbon dioxide device performed in this study is an important step towards bringing accessible breast cancer treatment to women in low-resource settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.4%
3
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
11
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
16
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%