Back

Effects of input image size on the accuracy of fish identification using deep learning.

Iwahara, Y.; Shibata, Y.; Manano, M.; Nishino, T.; Kariya, R.; Yaemori, H.

2024-03-04 ecology
10.1101/2024.03.01.582886 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The length composition of catches by species is important for stock assessment. However, length measurement is performed manually, jeopardizing the future of continuous measurement because of likely labor shortages. We focused on applying deep learning to estimate length composition by species from images of fish caught for sustainable management. In this study, input image sizes were varied to evaluate the effect of input image size on detection and classification accuracy, as a method for improving the accuracy. The images (43,226 fish of 85 classes) were captured on conveyor belts to sort set-net catches. Fish detection and classification were performed using Mask R-CNN. The effect of input image size on accuracy was examined using three image sizes of 1333x888, 2000x1333, and 2666x1777 pixels, achieving an mAP50-95 of 0.580 or higher. The accuracy improved with increasing image size, attaining a maximum improvement of 4.3% compared to the smallest size. However, increasing the image size too far from the default size may not improve the accuracy of models with fine-tuning. Improvements in accuracy were primarily observed for the species with low accuracy at the smallest image size. Increasing image size would be a useful and simple way to improve accuracy for these species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.