Linked Exposures Across Databases (LEAD): An exposure data aggregation framework to facilitate clinical exposure review
Samuel, I. B.; Pollin, K.; Tschida, S.; Lu, C.; Prisco, M.; Forsten, R.; Ortiz, J.; Barrett, J.; Reinhard, M.; Costanzo, M.
Show abstract
Understanding the health outcomes of military exposures is a critical effort for Veterans, their health care team, and national leaders. Veterans Affairs providers receive reports of military exposure related concerns from 43% of Veterans. Understanding the causal influences of environmental exposures on health is a complex task advancement in exposure science and may require interpreting multiple data sources; particularly when exposure pathways and multi-exposure interactions are ill-defined, as is the case for complex and emerging military service-related exposures. Thus, there is a need to standardize clinically meaningful exposure metrics from different data sources to guide clinicians and researchers with a consistent model for investigating and communicating exposure risk profiles. The Linked Exposures Across Databases (LEAD) framework provides a unifying model for characterizing exposure from different exposure datatypes and databases with a focus on providing clinically relevant exposure metrics. Application of LEAD is demonstrated through comparison of different military exposure data sources: Veteran Military Occupational and Environmental Exposure Assessment Tool (VMOAT), Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record (ILER) database and a military incident report database, the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Information Management System (EODIMS). This cohesive method for evaluating military exposures leverages established information with new sources of data and has the potential to influence how military exposure data is integrated into exposure health care and investigational models.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of Non-exhaust Emissions on the Asthmatic Airway (IONA) Protocol for a randomised three exposure crossover study 93%
- HIPTox – Hazard Identification Platform to Assess the Health Impacts from Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollutant Exposures, through Mechanistic Toxicology: A single-centre double-blind human exposure trial protocol 93%
- Short-term acute exposure to wildfire smoke and lung function in a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerosol tracer testing in Boeing 767 and 777 aircraft to simulate exposure potential of infectious aerosol such as SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Association of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in moss with blood biomarker among nearby residents in Portland, Oregon 93%
- Radioactive Contamination in Feral Dogs in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone: Population Body-Burden Survey and Implications for Human Radiation Exposure 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in False Negative Rate of RT-PCR Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure 92%
- Quantification of occupational and community risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers in a large U.S. healthcare system 86%
- Reduced COVID-19-Related Critical Illness and Death, and High Risk of Epidemic Resurgence, After Physical Distancing in Ontario, Canada 85%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.