Back

Linked Exposures Across Databases (LEAD): An exposure data aggregation framework to facilitate clinical exposure review

Samuel, I. B.; Pollin, K.; Tschida, S.; Lu, C.; Prisco, M.; Forsten, R.; Ortiz, J.; Barrett, J.; Reinhard, M.; Costanzo, M.

2024-03-02 health informatics
10.1101/2024.03.01.24303567 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the health outcomes of military exposures is a critical effort for Veterans, their health care team, and national leaders. Veterans Affairs providers receive reports of military exposure related concerns from 43% of Veterans. Understanding the causal influences of environmental exposures on health is a complex task advancement in exposure science and may require interpreting multiple data sources; particularly when exposure pathways and multi-exposure interactions are ill-defined, as is the case for complex and emerging military service-related exposures. Thus, there is a need to standardize clinically meaningful exposure metrics from different data sources to guide clinicians and researchers with a consistent model for investigating and communicating exposure risk profiles. The Linked Exposures Across Databases (LEAD) framework provides a unifying model for characterizing exposure from different exposure datatypes and databases with a focus on providing clinically relevant exposure metrics. Application of LEAD is demonstrated through comparison of different military exposure data sources: Veteran Military Occupational and Environmental Exposure Assessment Tool (VMOAT), Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record (ILER) database and a military incident report database, the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Information Management System (EODIMS). This cohesive method for evaluating military exposures leverages established information with new sources of data and has the potential to influence how military exposure data is integrated into exposure health care and investigational models.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
11
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%