Back

Peptide Mold: A Novel Strategy for Mapping Potential Binding Sites in Protein Targets

Bagwe, P. B.; Jagtap, Y.; Ghegade, V.; Machhar, J. S.; Martis, E.; Joshi, S. V.; Kharkar, P. S.

2024-02-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.02.28.582665 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A novel concept titled Peptide Mold for mapping potential binding sites in protein targets is presented. A large multiconformer tetrapeptide library comprising of 32 million conformations of all possible combinations of naturally-occurring amino acids was constructed and used for molecular docking analysis in the substrate-binding site of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro enzyme. The top-ranking, structurally-diverse tetrapeptide docked conformations (symbolizing peptide mold, analogous to a clay mold) were used then for elucidating a five-point pharmacophore. Ligand-based virtual screening of a large, multiconformer library of phytoconstituents using the derived five-point pharmacophore led to identification of potential binders for SARS-CoV-2 PLpro at its substrate-binding site. The approach is based on generating the imprint of a macromolecular binding site (cavity) using tetrapeptides (clay), thereby generating a reverse mold (with definitive shape and size), which can further be used for identifying small-molecule ligands matching the captured features of the target binding site. The approach is based on the fact that the individual amino acids in the tetrapeptide represent all possible drug-receptor interaction features (electrostatic, H-bonding, van der Waals, dispersion and hydrophobic among others). The peptide mold approach can be extended to any protein target for mapping the binding site(s), and further use of the generated pharmacophore model for virtual screening of potential binders. The peptide mold approach is a robust, hybrid computational screening strategy, overcoming the present limitations of structure-based methods, e.g., molecular docking and the ligand-based methods such as pharmacophore search. Exploration of the peptide mold strategy is expected to yield high-quality, reliable and interesting virtual hits in the computational screening campaigns during the hit and lead identification stages.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
15
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%