Back

Oarfish: Enhanced probabilistic modeling leads to improved accuracy in long read transcriptome quantification

Jousheghani, Z. Z.; Patro, R.

2024-03-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.02.28.582591 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationLong read sequencing technology is becoming an increasingly indispensable tool in genomic and transcriptomic analysis. In transcriptomics in particular, long reads offer the possibility of sequencing full-length isoforms, which can vastly simplify the identification of novel transcripts and transcript quantification. However, despite this promise, the focus of much long read method development to date has been on transcript identification, with comparatively little attention paid to quantification. Yet, due to differences in the underlying protocols and technologies, lower throughput (i.e. fewer reads sequenced per sample compared to short read technologies), as well as technical artifacts, long read quantification remains a challenge, motivating the continued development and assessment of quantification methods tailored to this increasingly prevalent type of data. ResultsWe introduce a new method and software tool for long read transcript quantification called oarfish. Our model incorporates a novel and innovative coverage score, which affects the conditional probability of fragment assignment in the underlying probabilistic model. We demonstrate that by accounting for this coverage information, oarfish is able to produce more accurate quantification estimates than existing long read quantification methods, particularly when one considers the primary isoforms present in a particular cell line or tissue type. Availability and ImplementationOarfish is implemented in the Rust programming language, and is made available as free and open-source software under the BSD 3-clause license. The source code is available at https://www.github.com/COMBINE-lab/oarfish.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.