Exploring Genomic Large Language Models: Bridging the Gap between Natural Language and Gene Sequences
Liu, H.; Zhou, S.; Chen, P.; Liu, J.; Huo, K.-G.; Han, L.
Show abstract
MotivationWith the rapid development of genomic sequencing technologies and accumulation of sequencing data, there is an increasing demand for analysis tools that are more user-friendly for non-programmer users. In support of this initiative, we developed an all-in-one tool called GenomicLLM that can understand simple grammar in the question input and perform different types of analyses and tasks accordingly. ReaultsWe trained the GenomicLLM model using three large open-access datasets, namely GenomicLLM_GRCh38, Genome Understanding Evaluation and GenomicBenchmarks, and developed a hybrid tokenization approach to allow better comprehension from mixed corpora that include sequence and non-sequence inputs. GenomicLLM can carry out a wider range of tasks. In the classification tasks that are also available in the state-of-the-art DNABERT-2 and HyenaDNA, GenomicLLM has comparable performance. Moreover, GenomicLLM can also carry out other regression and generation tasks that are not accomplishable by these tools. In summary, we demonstrated here a successful large language model with a mixture of gene sequences and natural language corpus that enables a wider range of applications. Availability and implementationCodes and data can be accessed at https://github.com/Huatsing-Lau/GenomicLLM and https://zenodo.org/records/10695802
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Generating realistic artificial Human genomes using adversarial autoencoders 94%
- GeneMark-EP and -EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins 93%
- SyMetrics: An Integrated Machine Learning Model for Evaluating the Pathogenicity of Synonymous Variants in the Human Genome 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.