Back

Trends, District-Level Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Section Delivery and its Association with Neonatal Mortality in Bangladesh

Khan, M. N.; Alam, M. B.; Khanam, S. J.; Islam, M. M.; Billah, M. A.

2024-02-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.26.24303360 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCesarean section (CS) rates have risen dramatically worldwide, with a majority of the countries exceeding the World Health Organizations (WHO) preferred rate of 10-15%. However, disparities exist, with evidence suggesting that socioeconomic disadvantage and geographic location play significant roles. Despite this, comprehensive estimates, especially in Bangladesh, remain scarce. This study aims to determine trends, district-level variations, and socioeconomic disparities in CS rates in Bangladesh. MethodsData from six rounds of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys were analyzed. The considered outcome variables were the occurrence of CS delivery in relation to the mode of delivery and delivery place. Neonatal mortality was also assessed as another outcome variable. Explanatory variables included districts, wealth quintiles, and socio-demographic characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used to provide an over-the-year trend and variation in CS delivery in Bangladesh. Multilevel mixed-effects binary logistic regressions were used to explore predictors of CS delivery and the association between CS and neonatal mortality. ResultsBetween 1999/2000 and 2017/18, hospital births in Bangladesh increased by 42%, primarily driven by a substantial rise in CS delivery, from 30% to 66%. Private healthcare facilities played a significant role, contributing 80% of the countrys total CS delivery in 2017/18, a substantial increase from 45.5% in 1999/2000. In contrast, CS delivery rates in government healthcare facilities decreased from 49.7% to 15.5% during the same period. Deficient use of CS was reported by women in border and hilly districts, as well as those in the poorest wealth quintile. A clear link between a CS delivery and neonatal mortality was not found. ConclusionThe uneven distribution of CS delivery across districts and socioeconomic groups underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to childbirth. While government efforts to curb unnecessary use of CS have fallen short, this study suggests a one-size-fits-all strategy could worsen disparities. Instead, the focus should shift from mere accessibility to ensuring justified and appropriate utilization, with public healthcare facilities playing a key role in offering safe alternatives.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
22
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
IJID Regions
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
30
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%