Student and staff experiences of a novel curriculum-based peer support intervention ("study groups") to support the mental health and wellbeing of postgraduate taught students
McCloud, T.; James, T.; Rowe, S.; Huntley, J.; Lewis, G.; Callender, C.; Johnson, S.; Billings, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn recent years there has been increasing concern for the wellbeing of higher education students, and institutions are under pressure to act. Loneliness and social isolation appear common among students, particularly postgraduate taught (PGT) students, and are linked to adverse outcomes such as depression and abandoning studies. We have in place a novel curriculum-based peer support intervention ("study groups") that may help support the mental health and wellbeing of postgraduate taught students. AimThis study aimed to explore student and staff experiences of the study groups and their perceptions of how they may influence social cohesion, loneliness and wellbeing. MethodsQualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with students and staff to explore their experiences and views of the study groups intervention. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed by the study authors following the principles of reflexive thematic analysis. ResultsWe completed interviews with 20 students and five staff members. We found that students valued the study groups as a way to make friends, improve feelings of connectedness and cohesion, and receive emotional support. The shared experience of group members was key, although completing joint assignments could be a stressor for some. ConclusionsThis research suggests that this is a promising intervention to support the mental health and wellbeing of higher education students, and to reduce loneliness and improve social cohesion.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 96%
- Learn!Bio - A time-limited cross-sectional study on biosciences students' pathway to resilience during and post the Covid-19 pandemic at an UK university from 2020-2023 and insights into future teaching approaches. 96%
- Undergraduate students with and without mental health concerns have different perceptions of disclosing mental health challenges to instructors 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 93%
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan 92%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low uptake of COVID-19 lateral flow testing among university students: a mixed methods evaluation 94%
- Factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures in the UK; a cross-sectional survey 88%
- Learning about COVID-19 across borders: Public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 91%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 90%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.