Back

Dissecting the genetic overlap between three complex phenotypes with trivariate MiXeR

Shadrin, A. A.; Hindley, G.; Hagen, E.; Parker, N.; Tesfaye, M.; Jaholkowski, P.; Rahman, Z.; Kutrolli, G.; Fominykh, V.; Djurovic, S.; Smeland, O. B.; O'Connell, K. S.; van der Meer, D.; Frei, O.; Andreassen, O. A.; Dale, A. M.

2024-02-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.02.23.24303236 medRxiv
Show abstract

Comorbidities are an increasing global health challenge. Accumulating evidence suggests overlapping genetic architectures underlying comorbid complex human traits and disorders. The bivariate causal mixture model (MiXeR) can quantify the polygenic overlap between complex phenotypes beyond global genetic correlation. Still, the pattern of genetic overlap between three distinct phenotypes, which is important to better characterize multimorbidities, has previously not been possible to quantify. Here, we present and validate the trivariate MiXeR tool, which disentangles the pattern of genetic overlap between three phenotypes using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our simulations show that the trivariate MiXeR can reliably reconstruct different patterns of genetic overlap. We further demonstrate how the tool can be used to estimate the proportions of genetic overlap between three phenotypes using real GWAS data, providing examples of complex patterns of genetic overlap between diverse human traits and diseases that could not be deduced from bivariate analyses. This contributes to a better understanding of the etiology of complex phenotypes and the nature of their relationship, which may aid in dissecting comorbidity patterns and their biological underpinnings. Availability and implementationThe trivariate MiXeR tool and auxiliary scripts, including source code, documentation and examples of use are available at https://github.com/precimed/mix3r

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.