Back

Tixagevimab-cilgavimab (AZD7442) for the treatment of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy): A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

HITES, M.; MASSONNAUD, C. R.; JAMARD, S.; Goehringer, F.; DANION, F.; REIGNIER, J.; DE CASTRO, N.; GAROT, D.; LARRANAGA LAPIQUE, E.; LACOMBE, K.; TOLSMA, V.; FAURE, E.; MALVY, D.; STAUB, T.; COURJON, J.; CAZENAVE-ROBLOT, F.; DYRHOL RIISE, A. M.; LE TURNIER, P.; MARTIN BLONDEL, G.; ROGER, C.; AKINOSOGLOU, K.; LE MOING, V.; PIROTH, L.; SELLIER, P.; LESCURE, X.; TROSEID, M.; CLEVENBERGH, P.; DALGARD, O.; GALLIEN, S.; GOUSSEFF, M.; LOUBET, P.; BOUNES - VARDON, F.; VISEE, C.; BELKHIR, L.; BOTELHO-NEVERS, E.; CABIE, A.; KOTANIDOU, A.; LANTERNIER, F.; ROUVEIX-NORDON, E.; SILVA, S.; THIERY, G.; POIGNA

2024-02-24 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.02.23.24302586 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTixagevimab and cilgavimab (AZD7442) are two monoclonal antibodies developed by AstraZeneca for the pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2. Its effectiveness and safety in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was not known at the outset of this trial. MethodsDisCoVeRy is a phase 3, adaptive, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial conducted in 63 sites in Europe. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive placebo or tixagevimab-cilgavimab in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome was the clinical status at day 15 measured by the WHO seven-point ordinal scale. Several clinical, virological, immunological and safety endpoints were also assessed. FindingsDue to slow enrolment, recruitment was stopped on July 1st, 2022. The antigen positive modified intention-to-treat population (mITT) was composed of 173 participants randomized to tixagevimab-cilgavimab (N = 91) or placebo (N = 82), 91.9% (159/173) with supplementary oxygen, and 47.4% (82/173) previously vaccinated at inclusion. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the WHO ordinal scale at day 15 between the two groups (odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95%CI [0.54-1.61]; p = 0.81) nor in any clinical, virological or safety secondary endpoints. In the global mITT (N = 226), neutralization antibody titers were significantly higher in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group/patients compared to placebo at day 3 (Least-squares mean differences (LSMD) 1.44, 95% Confidence interval (CI) [1.20-1.68]; p < 10-23) and day 8 (LSMD 0.91, 95%CI [0.64-1.18]; p < 10-8) and it was most important for patients infected with a pre-omicron variant, both at day 3 (LSMD 1.94, 95% CI [1.67-2.20], p < 10-25) and day 8 (LSMD 1.17, 95% CI [0.87-1.47], p < 10-9), with a significant interaction (p < 10-7 and p = 0.01 at days 3 and 8, respectively). InterpretationThere were no significant differences between tixagevimab-cilgavimab and placebo in clinical endpoints, however the trial lacked power compared to prespecified calculations. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab was well tolerated, with low rates of treatment related events. FundingTrial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04315948. Registered on 13 March 2020 updated on 22 April 2021.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.3%
2
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
4
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%