Back

Optimising the production of dsRNA biocontrols in microbial systems using multiple transcriptional terminators.

Ross, S. J.; Owen, G.; Hough, J.; Philips, A.; Maddelein, W.; Ray, J.; Kilby, P.; Dickman, M. J.

2024-02-23 synthetic biology
10.1101/2024.02.22.581520 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Crop pests and pathogens annually cause over $100 billion in global crop damage, with insects consuming 5-20% of major grain crops. Current crop pest and disease control strategies rely on insecticidal and fungicidal sprays, plant genetic resistance, transgenes and agricultural practices. dsRNA is emerging as a novel sustainable method of plant protection as an alternative to traditional chemical pesticides. Successful commercialisation of dsRNA based biocontrols requires the economical production of large quantities of dsRNA combined with suitable delivery methods to ensure RNAi efficacy against the target pest. In this study, we have optimised the design of plasmid DNA constructs to produce dsRNA biocontrols in E. coli, by employing a wide range of alternative synthetic transcriptional terminators prior to measurement of dsRNA yield. We demonstrate that a 7.8-fold increase of dsRNA was achieved using triple synthetic transcriptional terminators within a dual T7 dsRNA production system compared to the absence of transcriptional terminators. Moreover, our data demonstrates that batch fermentation production dsRNA using multiple transcriptional terminators is scalable and generates significantly higher yields of dsRNA generated in the absence of transcriptional terminators at both small-scale batch culture and large-scale fermentation. In addition, we show that application of these dsRNA biocontrols expressed in E. coli cells results in increased insect mortality. Finally, novel mass spectrometry analysis was performed to determine the precise sites of transcriptional termination at the different transcriptional terminators providing important further mechanistic insight.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.2%
5
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
BMC Biotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbial Biotechnology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
10
Synthetic Biology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
New Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Metabolic Engineering Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
19
The CRISPR Journal
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
21
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
24
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Current Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%