Back

Increase but pronounced regional disparities in gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) prescriptions among Medicaid and Medicare patients

Barnhart, J.; Vujovich, S.; Piper, B.

2024-02-22 health economics
10.1101/2024.02.20.24303095 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a Schedule III drug in the US approved for treatment of cataplexy associated with narcolepsy. Narcolepsy with cateplaxy is a rare disorder with an annual incidence of less than one per one-hundred thousand and GHB is a third-line treatment. The purpose of this study was to describe the temporal pattern of GHB distribution and cost nationally and between states for Medicaid and Medicare patients. MethodsGHB prescriptions were extracted from the State Utilization Data Tool from Medicaid.gov and the Medicare part D Prescribers by Provider and Drug Dataset from CMS.gov. GHB prescriptions were examined by state when corrected for population. States outside a 95% confidence interval were considered statistically significant. GHB cost analyses were performed between 2017-2021. GHB prescribers were identified for Medicare in 2019. ResultsThere was a steady increase in prescriptions (+88.5%) from 2019 to 2021 and spending (+39.6%) from 2017 to 2020 for Medicaid. Specialists other than somnologists, were found to prescribe the highest number of GHB prescriptions to Medicare Part D enrollees. In 2019, two states (Hawaii and North Dakota) did not prescribe GHB to Medicare patients versus twenty states for Medicaid patients. Marylands prescribing to Medicare patients was significantly elevated (269.2/100K). ConclusionGHB prescribing has increased to Medicaid and Medicare patients. Further research is necessary to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic and off-label prescribing (e.g. for excessive daytime sleepiness) may have affected these findings including the origins of the pronounced state level disparities.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
8
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
10
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%