Mental illness stigma in England: What happened after the Time to Change Programme to reduce stigma and discrimination?
Ronaldson, A.; Henderson, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundWe investigated the extent to which positive changes in stigma outcomes reported over the course of Time to Change were sustained by 2023, two years after the programmes end in 2021. MethodsWe used regression analyses to evaluate trends in outcomes. Measures were of stigma-related knowledge (Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS)), attitudes (Community Attitudes to the Mentally Ill scale (CAMI)), and desire for social distance (Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS)). We also examined willingness to interact with people based on vignettes of depression and schizophrenia, and attitudes towards workplace discrimination against people with these conditions, using data from the British Social Attitudes Survey (BSAS) 2015 for comparison. FindingsReported in standard deviation units (95% confidence intervals (CI)), attitudes towards mental illness improved between 2008 and 2023 (SD=0.24, 95% CI=0.16 to 0.31), but following an increase of 9.9% between 2008-19, scores decreased by 3.3% (p=0.015). After improvements to 2019, 2023 MAKS and RIBS scores no longer differed from 2009 scores, indicating decreases since 2019 in stigma-related knowledge (MAKS scores declined 7.8% since 2019, p<0.001) and willingness to interact (RIBS scores declined by 10.2% since 2019, p<0.001). Conversely, comparison with BSAS 2015 data indicated that in 2023 respondents were more willing to interact with people with depression ({beta}=-2.69, p<0.001) and schizophrenia ({beta}=-2.70, p<0.001); and more likely to agree that people with either condition are just as likely to be promoted, and to disagree that their medical history should influence this. This change was most pronounced for schizophrenia (OR=2.52, 95% CI=2.02 to 3.14). ConclusionsThe lasting positive changes reflect support for non-discrimination and willingness to interact with someone after a sense of familiarity is evoked. Besides the end of Time to Change, interpretations for declines in other outcomes include the impacts of the covid-19 pandemic; economic stress; and reduced access to healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 98%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 95%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 96%
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 95%
- Mental health in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: early observations 94%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Using electronic health records to evaluate a children and young people's social prescribing service: Challenges and implications for research and practice 92%
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospitalization for self-harm during the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic in France: a nationwide study 92%
- COVID-19 illness severity and 2-year prevalence of physical symptoms: an observational study in Iceland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark 91%
- Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.