Back

Machine Learning Approaches in Label-Free Small Extracellular Vesicles Analysis with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) for Cancer Diagnostics

Vang, D.; Kelly, M.; Sharma, M.; Sheokand, M.; Esfandiari, L.; Dima, R. I.; Strobbia, P.

2024-02-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.02.19.581099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early diagnosis remains of pivotal importance in reducing patient morbidity and mortality in cancer. To this end, liquid biopsy is emerging as a tool to perform broad cancer screenings. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), also called exosomes, found in bodily fluids can serve as important cancer biomarkers in these screenings. Our group has recently developed a label-free electrokinetic microchip to purify sEVs from blood. Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility to integrate this approach with surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) analysis. SERS can be used to characterized extracted sEVs through their vibrational fingerprint that changes depending on the origin of sEVs. While these changes are not easily identified in spectra, they can be modeled with machine learning (ML) approaches. Common ML approaches in the field of spectral analysis use dimensionality reduction method that often function as a black box. To avoid this pitfall, we used Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) is a type of explainable AI (XAI) that bridges ML models and human comprehension by calculating the specific contribution of individual features to a models predictions, directly correlating model/decisions with the original data. Using these approaches we demonstrated a proof-of-concept model predictive of cancer from isolated sEVs, integrating the electrokinetic device and SERS. This work explores the use of explainable AI to perform diagnostic analysis on complex SERS data of clinical samples, while reporting interpretable biochemical information. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=74 SRC="FIGDIR/small/581099v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (18K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cbcb8aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9ffc00org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15999a9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1775726_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.