Back

Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Early-Onset Bipolar Using Electronic Health Records

Wang, B.; Sheu, Y.-h.; Lee, H.; Mealer, R. G.; Castro, V. M.; Smoller, J. W.

2024-02-21 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.02.19.24302919 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveEarly identification of bipolar disorder (BD) provides an important opportunity for timely intervention. In this study, we aimed to develop machine learning models using large-scale electronic health record (EHR) data including clinical notes for predicting early-onset BD. MethodStructured and unstructured data were extracted from the longitudinal EHR of the Mass General Brigham health system. We defined three cohorts aged 10 - 25 years: (1) the full youth cohort (N=300,398); (2) a sub-cohort defined by having a mental health visit (N=105,461); (3) a sub-cohort defined by having a diagnosis of mood disorder or ADHD (N=35,213). By adopting a prospective landmark modeling approach that aligns with clinical practice, we developed and validated a range of machine learning models including neural network-based models, across different cohorts and prediction windows. ResultsWe found the two tree-based models, Random forests (RF) and light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM), achieving good discriminative performance across different clinical settings (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.76-0.88 for RF and 0.74-0.89 for LGBM). In addition, we showed comparable performance can be achieved with a greatly reduced set of features, demonstrating computational efficiency can be attained without significant compromise of model accuracy. ConclusionGood discriminative performance for early-onset BD is achieved utilizing large-scale EHR data. Our study offers a scalable and accurate method for identifying youth at risk for BD that could help inform clinical decision making and facilitate early intervention. Future work includes evaluating the portability of our approach to other healthcare systems and exploring considerations regarding possible implementation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
2
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.6%
3
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
5
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
11
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
13
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
15
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
18
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
20
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
21
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 70%
1.0%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
29
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%