Back

Prevalence of visual impairment and its causes in adults aged 50 years and older: Estimates from the National Eye Surveys in Malaysia

Naing, N. N.; Salowi, M. A.; Mustafa, N.; Wan Nawang, W. R.; Sharudin, S. N.; Ngah, N. F.

2024-02-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.18.24303005 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPopulation surveys are necessary to measure a communitys eye care needs. We conducted simultaneous surveys in two regions in Malaysia in 2023 to estimate the prevalence of visual impairment (VI), identify its main causes, and compare the results with the survey in 2014. MethodsThe surveys were simultaneously done in Eastern and Sarawak administrative regions using the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) technique. It involved a multistage cluster sampling method, each cluster comprising 50 residents aged 50 years and older. The prevalence of VI (blindness, severeness, moderate, and early) and its primary cause were determined through a visual acuity check and eye examination with a hand-held ophthalmoscope. Results were compared with the previous survey in 2014. ResultsA total of 10,184 subjects were enumerated, and 9,709 were examined (94.5% and 96.2% responses for Eastern and Sarawak, respectively). The prevalence of blindness and severe VI appeared to decrease. For blindness: Eastern 1.4%, 95%CI (0.9, 1.9) to 0.8%, 95%CI (0.5, 1.1) and Sarawak: 1.6% 95%CI (1.0, 2.1) to 0.6%, 95%CI (0.3, 0.9). For severe VI: Eastern 1.2%, 95%CI (0.8, 1.7) to 0.9%, 95%CI (0.6, 1.1) and Sarawak 1.1% 95%CI (0.6, 1.6) to 0.9%, 95% CI(0.6, 1.2). The main cause of blindness was untreated cataracts: 77.3% (Eastern) and 75.0% (Sarawak). Diabetic retinopathy was the 2nd main cause of blindness for Eastern at 9.1%, but it only caused early to severe VI in Sarawak. ConclusionThe prevalence of blindness and severe VI were reduced. The reduction could have been attributed to a community cataract program implemented soon after the survey in 2014. However, more efforts are needed to address the high percentage of avoidable blindness within both regions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.