Back

Cross Border Population Movement Patterns, Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda, November 2022.

King, P.; Wanyana, M. W.; Mayinja, H.; Nakafeero Simbwa, B.; Zalwango, M. G.; Owens Kobusinge, J.; Migisha, R.; Kadobera, D.; Kwesiga, B.; Bulage, L.; Nsiimire Gonahasa, D.; Ahabwe Babigumira, P.; Nchoko, S.; Salat, E.; Weithaka, F.; Gunya, O.; Odhiambo, F.; Mutabazi, V.; Habimana, M.; Twagirimana, G.; Ndabarinze, E.; Manishimwe, A.; Itiakorit, H.; Kadivani, S.; Seib, K.; Whitney, E.; Ario, A. R.

2024-02-20 public and global health
10.1101/2024.02.16.24302786 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe frequent population movement across the five East African Countries poses risk of disease spread in the region. A clear understanding of population movement patterns is critical for informing cross-border disease control interventions. We assessed population mobility patterns across the borders of the East African states of Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. MethodsIn November 2022, we conducted Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), and participatory mapping. Participants were selected using purposive sampling and a topic guide used during interviews. Key informants included border districts (Uganda and Rwanda) and county health officials (Kenya). FGD participants were identified from border communities and travellers and these included truck drivers, commercial motorcyclists, and businesspersons. During KIIs and FGDs, we conducted participatory mapping using Population Connectivity Across Borders toolkits. Data were analysed using grounded theory approach using Atlas ti 7 software. ResultsDifferent age groups travelled across borders for various reasons. Younger age groups travelled across the border for education, trade, social reasons, employment opportunities, agriculture and mining. While older age groups mainly travelled for healthcare and social reasons. Other common reasons for crossing the borders included religious and cultural matters. Respondents reported seasonal variations in the volume of travellers. Respondents reported using both official (4 Kenya-Uganda, 5 Rwanda-Uganda borders) and unofficial Points of Entry (PoEs) (14 Kenya-Uganda, 20 Uganda-Rwanda) for exit and entry movements on borders. Unofficial PoEs were preferred because they had fewer restrictions like the absence of health screening, and immigration and customs checks. Key destination points (points of interest) included: markets, health facilities, places of worship, education institutions, recreational facilities and business towns. Twenty-eight health facilities (10- Lwakhakha, Uganda, 10- Lwakhakha, Kenya, and 8- Cyanika, Uganda) along the borders were the most commonly visited by the travellers and border communities. ConclusionComplex population movement and connectivity patterns were identified along the borders. These were used to guide cross-border disease surveillance and other border health strategies in the three countries. Findings were used to revise district response and preparedness plans by strengthening community-based surveillance in border communities.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.