Back

Model-Based Estimation of Active and Passive Muscle Forces Using MRE in Forearm Muscles During 2-DOF Wrist Tasks

Helm, C.; Sergi, F.

2024-02-20 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.02.15.580561 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-based muscle force estimation methods have been proposed to estimate individual muscle forces based on measurements of shear wave speed and joint torque in multiple postures. To estimate both the slope and offset parameters of the relationship between shear wave speed and muscle force, it is necessary to collect measurements in a plethora of postures in case of substantial muscle redundancy. However, anisotropic MRE requires a structural and diffusion-tensor imaging scan in each posture, which is infeasible given the time constraints of MRI imaging. The objectives of this work were to develop a muscle force estimator with sufficient accuracy that would only require a limited set of postures, and to evaluate its effectiveness under a variety of measurement conditions. We developed a novel MRE-based muscle force estimator, which decouples shear wave speed into its active and passive components and solves for the slope and offset parameters, independently. We assessed the effectiveness of the proposed estimator under different simulated measurement conditions, with varying levels of noise, and compared it to the original MRE-based estimator. The proposed estimator results in a reduction in the estimation error for the offset parameter, for all muscles, without significant degradation in the estimation error for the slope parameter. However, the proposed muscle force estimator does not improve the goodness-of-fit or the cross-validation error compared to the original estimator. In conclusion, the proposed MRE-based muscle force estimator improves the estimation of muscle-specific parameters and may yield increased muscle force estimation performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.2%
3
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.6%
5
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
9
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
11
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%