Multivariate genome-wide association analysis of quantitative reading skill and dyslexia improves gene discovery
Mountford, H. S.; Eising, E.; Fontanillas, P.; Auton, A.; 23andMe Research Team, ; Irving-Pease, E. K.; Doust, C.; Bates, T. C.; Martin, N. G.; Fisher, S. E.; Luciano, M.
Show abstract
The ability to read is an important life skill and a major route to education. Individual differences in reading ability are influenced by genetic variation, with a heritability of 0.66 for word reading, estimated by twin studies. Until recently, genomic investigations were limited by modest sample size. Here we use a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) method, MTAG, to leverage summary statistics from two independent GWAS efforts, boosting power for analyses of reading ability; GenLang meta-analysis of word reading (N = 27 180) and the 23andMe, Inc., study of dyslexia (Ncases = 51 800, Ncontrols = 1 087 070). We increase effective sample size to N = 102 082, representing the largest genetic study of reading ability, to date. We identified 35 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 7 regions not previously reported. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) based heritability was estimated at 24%. We observed clear positive genetic correlations with cognitive and educational measures. Gene-set analyses implicated neuronal synapses and proneural glioblastoma pathways, further supported by enrichment of neuronally expressed genes in the developing embryonic brain. Polygenic scores of our multivariate results predicted between 2.29-3.50% of variance in reading ability in an independent sample, the National Child Development Study cohort (N = 6 410). Polygenic adaptation was examined using a large panel of ancient genomes spanning the last [~]15k years. We did not find evidence of selection, suggesting that reading ability may not have been subject to recent selection pressure in Europeans. By combining existing datasets to improve statistical power, these results provide novel insights into the biology of reading.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of rare protein coding genetic variation on adult cognitive function 96%
- Investigating the Genetic Architecture of Non-Cognitive Skills Using GWAS-by-Subtraction 95%
- Identification of shared and differentiating genetic risk for autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and case subgroups 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-read genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders 94%
- Functional characterization of pathogenic SATB2 missense variants identifies distinct effects on chromatin binding and transcriptional activity 94%
- Whole genome sequence-based association analysis of African American individuals with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Widespread recessive effects on common diseases in a cohort of 44,000 British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis with high autozygosity 95%
- Chromosome X-Wide Common Variant Association Study (XWAS) in Autism Spectrum Disorder 95%
- Brain eQTLs of European, African American, and Asian ancestry improve interpretation of schizophrenia GWAS 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic insights into smoking behaviours in 10,558 men of African ancestry from continental Africa and the UK 93%
- Altered gene expression profiles impair the nervous system development in individuals with 15q13.3 microdeletion 93%
- The genetic architecture of cerebellar lobules: Insights from the UK Biobank 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.