Back

Cytotoxicity and resistance evolution of a novel antifungal carbon nanoparticle

Poudel Sharma, S.; Paudyal, S.; Domena, J.; Zhou, Y.; Cleven, E. C.; Agatemor, C.; Van Dyken, J. D.; Leblanc, R. M.

2024-02-12 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.02.11.579833 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antifungal drug resistance is a major problem in healthcare and agriculture. Synthesizing new drugs is one of the major mitigating strategies for overcoming this problem. In this context, carbon-dots (CDs) are a newer category of nanoparticles that have wide applications, potentially including use as antibiotics. However, there is a lack of understanding of the effect of long-term use of CDs as antimicrobials, particularly the ability of microbes to evolve resistance to antibiotic CDs. In this study, we synthesized novel florescent the bottom-up method using two antifungal drugs fluconazole and nourseothricin sulphate (ClonNAT). We first extensively characterized the physical properties of the newly synthesized carbon dots, Flu-Clo CDs. We measured the cytotoxicity of Flu-Clo CDs on budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and determined that it had comparable antifungal inhibition with extensively used drug fluconazole. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Flu-CLO CDs are not cytotoxic to human fibroblasts cell lines. Then, we quantified the ability of yeast to evolve resistance to Flu-Clo CDs. We evolved replicate laboratory yeast populations for 250 generations in the presence of Flu-Clo CDs or aqueous fluconazole. We found that yeast evolved resistance to Flu-Clo CDs and aqueous fluconazole at similar rates. Further, we found that resistance to Flu-Clo CDs conferred cross-resistance to aqueous fluconazole. Overall, the results demonstrate the efficacy of CDs as potential antifungal drugs. We can conclude that yeast populations can adapt quickly to novel antibiotics including CD based antibiotics, including CD-based antibiotics indicating the importance of proper use of antimicrobials in combating infections.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
6
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
19
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
26
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%