Minimal training of fieldworkers in resource-poor settings for rapid assessment of scabies prevalence: a diagnostic accuracy study in Mopeia, Mozambique
Furnival-Adams, J.; Lopez, V.; Mundaca, H.; Houana, A.; Macucha, A.; Elobolobo, E.; Xerinda, A.; Munguambe, H.; Materrula, F.; Rabinovich, R.; Engelman, D.; Chaccour, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundScabies is endemic in many tropical, resource-poor areas, causing significant morbidity. Our understanding of the true burden of scabies in Africa is very limited, and we lack tools to accurately assess its prevalence, given our reliance on highly qualified doctors and microscopy for diagnosis. The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of minimally trained fieldworker diagnosis of scabies, compared to diagnosis by experienced medical doctors. MethodologyWe trained 62 fieldworkers with a minimum of secondary school education in the diagnosis of scabies (categorized as either clinical or suspected), and in terms of severity, based on lesion count. Immediately after the training, we assessed their knowledge based on written assessments. We also assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a sub-sample of the fieldworkers in the field compared to the reference standard (experienced medical doctors). 193 individuals were assessed for scabies. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated, as well as agreement (kappa coefficients) between medical doctors and between fieldworkers. ResultsThe overall median results in written assessments were around 80%. Of the 193 people assessed for scabies, 27% were classified as having scabies according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of fieldworker diagnosis compared to the reference standard was 95% (95%CI 93 -100), and the specificity was 99% (95%CI 99-100). The sensitivity for severe scabies was lower at 64% (95%CI 51-75), and the mean specificity was 100%. Kappa coefficients were 1.00 between medical doctors and 0.95 between fieldworkers. ConclusionsFieldworkers without medical qualifications were capable of diagnosing scabies to a similar level of accuracy as experienced medical doctors, after a short period of focal training. This may facilitate rapid assessments of scabies prevalence for public health purposes and decisions about MDA implementation in similar settings. Author summaryO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSScabies is a disease that causes intense itchiness which can affect peoples wellbeing and ability to attend work or school, and if left untreated it can lead to further, more severe complications. Typically, scabies is diagnosed by specialist medical doctors using microscopy. However, many countries lack these resources and therefore there is a paucity of data on scabies prevalence. What this study adds-In our study, we trained people with no previous medical training in the diagnosis of scabies over a few days through presentations and assessments. We demonstrated that they were able to diagnose scabies to a similar degree of accuracy compared to experienced medical doctors. How this study might affect research, practice or policy-Understanding that minimally trained fieldworkers are able to diagnose scabies to a similar degree of accuracy as medical doctors, may facilitate the collection of data for survey purposes in resource-poor areas, which in turn may promote advocacy for the disease.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Field evaluation of Standard Q Filariasis Antigen Test for Lymphatic Filariasis (LF) during a pre-transmission assessment survey in Sierra Leone, 2022 96%
- The prevalence of scabies in Monrovia, Liberia: a population-based survey 95%
- A facility and community-based assessment of scabies in rural Malawi 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating post-validation surveillance of lymphatic filariasis with the WHO STEPwise approach to non-communicable disease risk factor surveillance in Niue, a study protocol 95%
- Have you heard of Rift Valley fever? Findings from a multi-country study in East and Central Africa 94%
- A comprehensive evaluation of an artificial intelligence based digital pathology to monitor large-scale deworming programs against soil-transmitted helminths: a study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low prevalence of scabies and impetigo in Dakar/Senegal: a cluster-randomised, cross-sectional survey 97%
- Effectiveness of community-based burden estimation to achieve elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a comparative cross-sectional investigation in Côte d’Ivoire 95%
- Syndromic surveillance during 2022 Uganda martyrs’ commemoration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of risk factors associated with and practices of cattle farmers in Kirehe District Rwanda with respect to vector-borne and zoonotic pathogens 92%
- Seroprevalence and parasite rates of Plasmodium malariae in a high malaria transmission setting of southern Nigeria. 92%
- Exploring the role of the private sector in tuberculosis detection and management in Lima, Peru: a mixed-methods patient pathway analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Laboratory Comparison of Rapid Antigen Diagnostic Tests for Lymphatic Filariasis: STANDARD TM Q Filariasis Antigen Test (QFAT) and Bioline Filariasis Test Strip (FTS) 94%
- Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in urban and periurban human populations in Arequipa, Peru 91%
- Risk screening tools could potentially miss out HIV positive individuals who seek testing services: A secondary program data analysis on the performance characteristics of an adolescent and adult HIV risk screening tool in Uganda 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.