Back

Invariant sets for switched systems to tackle bacterial resistance

Anderson, A.; Kinahan, M. W.; Gonzalez, A. H.; Udekwu, K.; Hernandez-Vargas, E. A.

2024-02-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.02.06.579227 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The limited availability of antibiotics and the need for prompt decision-making present significant challenges for healthcare practitioners. When faced with this situation, practitioners must prioritize their approach based on several key factors. By leveraging the emergent understanding of collateral sensitivity among antibiotic-exposed pathogens, we demonstrate the utility of control invariant sets to predict treatment failure when antibiotic cycling is applied as a therapeutic strategy aiming to eradicate or prevent emergence of multi-drug resistant pathogens. Our results here pave the way for point-of-care diagnostic technologies to identify infections and select appropriate treatments quickly, reducing unnecessary antibiotic use.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Biosystems
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Mathematics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Life
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
○ 638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
30
Neural Computation
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.