Back

Peptide-based capture-and-release purification of extracellular vesicles and statistical algorithm enabled quality assessment

Greenberg, Z. F.; Ali, S.; Schmittgen, T. D.; Han, S.; Hughes, S. J.; Graim, K. S.; He, M.

2024-02-08 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.02.06.578050 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) have gained significant attention for discovering tumor biomarkers. However, isolating EVs with well-defined homogeneous populations from complex biological samples is challenging. Different isolation methods have been found to derive different EV populations carrying different molecular contents, which confounds current investigations and hinders subsequent clinical translation. Therefore, standardizing and building a rigorous assessment of isolated EV quality associated with downstream molecular analysis is essential. To address this need, we introduce a statistical algorithm (ExoQuality Index, EQI) by integrating multiple EV characterizations (size, particle concentration, zeta potential, total protein, and RNA), enabling direct EV quality assessment and comparisons between different isolation methods. We also introduced a novel capture-release isolation approach using a pH-responsive peptide conjugated with NanoPom magnetic beads (ExCy) for simple, fast, and homogeneous EV isolation from various biological fluids. Bioinformatic analysis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of EV total RNAs from pancreatic cancer patient plasma samples using our novel EV isolation approach and quality index strategy illuminates how this approach improves the identification of tumor associated molecular markers. Results showed higher human mRNA coverage compared to existing isolation approaches in terms of both pancreatic cancer pathways and EV cellular component pathways using gProfiler pathway analysis. This study provides a valuable resource for researchers, establishing a workflow to prepare and analyze EV samples carefully and contributing to the advancement of reliable and rigorous EV quality assessment and clinical translation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Extracellular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
4
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
8
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
9
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
15
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
17
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
24
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
29
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
30
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%