Back

Evaluation of the WHO HEARTS hypertension control package in primary care clinics of rural Bangladesh: a quasi-experimental trial

Abrar, A.; Aktar, J.; Jubayer, S.; Hu, X.; Sayem, M. N. N.; Sultana, S.; Abdullah Al Mamun, M.; Rahman Bhuiyan, M.; Malik, F. T.-N.; Amin, A. R.; Gupta, R.; Zhao, D.; Farrell, M.; Banigbe, B.; Matsushita, K.; Burka, D.; Appel, L. J.; Moran, A. E.; Choudhury, S. R.

2024-02-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.02.06.24302424 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the HEARTS technical package for improving hypertension control worldwide, but its effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated. MethodsA matched-pair cluster quasi-experimental trial in Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs; primary healthcare facilities) was conducted in rural Bangladesh. A total of 3,935 patients (mean age 52.3 years, 70.5% female) with uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure [BP] [&ge;]140/90 mm Hg regardless of treatment history) were enrolled: 1,950 patients from 7 UHCs implementing HEARTS and 1,985 patients from 7 matched usual care UHCs. WHO-HEARTS package intervention components were 1) simplified treatment protocol, 2) reliable medication supply, 3) team-based care, 4) standardized follow-up, and 5) a digital information system to track patients BP and monitor program performance. The primary outcome was systolic BP at six months measured at the patients home; secondary outcomes were diastolic BP, hypertension control rate (<140/90 mm Hg), and loss to follow-up. Multivariable mixed-effect linear and Poisson models were conducted as appropriate. ResultsBaseline mean systolic BP was 158.4 mm Hg in the intervention group and 158.8 mm Hg in the usual care group. At six months, the primary outcome was obtained in 95.5% of participants. Compared to usual care, the intervention significantly lowered systolic BP (-23.7 mm Hg vs. -20.0 mm Hg; net difference -3.7 mm Hg, p<0.001) and diastolic BP (-10.2 mm Hg vs. -8.3 mm Hg; net difference -1.9 mm Hg, p<0.001) and improved hypertension control (62.0% vs. 49.7%, net difference 12.3%, p<0.001). The occurrence of missed clinic visits was lower in the intervention group (8.8% vs. 39.3%, p<0.001). ConclusionsIn rural Bangladesh, WHO-HEARTS package implementation significantly lowered BP and improved hypertension control. These results support scale up of the WHO-HEARTS hypertension control package in Bangladesh and its implementation in other low- and middle-income countries. [clinicaltrials.gov registration ID NCT04992039] Clinical PerspectiveO_LIThe Global Hearts Initiative is implementing a standard World Health Organization (WHO) HEARTS package for hypertension control in primary care clinics of 32 low- and middle-income settings. This quasi-experimental trial was completed alongside HEARTS program expansion in rural Bangladesh and is the first to rigorously assess the complete HEARTS package for hypertension. C_LIO_LICompared with usual care, the WHO-HEARTS package significantly lowered blood pressure and improved hypertension control in hypertensive patients. C_LIO_LIWHO-HEARTS package implementation was feasible and effectively improved hypertension control in rural Bangladesh. The WHO-HEARTS is a standard and effective approach to improving hypertension control in low- and middle-income countries. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.