Back

Geldof Expert Consensus Classification of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Real-World Application in a Serial Fistula MRI Cohort

Schroeder, M. K.; Abushamma, S.; George, A. T.; Balakrishna, R.; Hickman, J.; Elumalai, A.; Wise, P.; Zulfiqar, M.; Ludwig, D. R.; Shetty, A.; Viswanath, S. E.; Luo, C.; Sebastian, S.; Ballard, D.; Deepak, P.

2024-02-04 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.02.03.24302160 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsPerianal fistulizing Crohns disease (CD-PAF) is an aggressive phenotype of Crohns disease (CD) defined by frequent relapses and disabling symptoms. A novel consensus classification system was recently outlined by Geldof et al. that seeks to unify disease severity with patient-centered goals but has not yet been validated. We aimed to apply this to a real-world cohort and identify factors that predict transition between classes over time. MethodsWe identified all patients with CD-PAF and at least one baseline and one follow-up pelvic (pMRI). Geldof Classification, disease characteristics, and imaging indices were collected retrospectively at time periods corresponding with respective MRIs. ResultsWe identified 100 patients with CD-PAF of which 96 were assigned Geldof Classes 1 - 2c at baseline. Most patients (78.1%) started in Class 2b, but changes in classification were observed in 52.1% of all patients. Male sex (72.0%, 46.6%, 40.0%, p = 0.03) and prior perianal surgery (52.0% vs 44.6% vs 40.0%, p = 0.02) were more frequently observed in those with improved. Baseline pMRI indices were not associated with changes in classification, however, greater improvements in mVAI, MODIFI-CD, and PEMPAC were seen among those who improved. Linear mixed effect modeling identified only male sex (-0.31, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.02) with improvement in class. ConclusionGeldof classification highlights the dynamic nature of CD-PAF over time, however, our ability to predict transitions between classes remains limited and requires prospective assessment. Improvement in MRI index scores over time was associated with a transition to lower Geldof classification.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.