Quantifying Fit-for-Purpose in Real World Data: Data Grading and FitQ Scores
Jackson, M. L.; Manickam, R.; Derieg, D.; Gombar, S.; Low, Y. S.
Show abstract
Real-world evidence (RWE), derived from analysis of RWD, is increasingly used to guide decisions in drug development, regulatory oversight, and clinical decision-making. Evaluating the fitness-for-purpose of RWD sources is one key component to generating transparent RWE. Here, we demonstrate tools that fill two gaps in the data grading literature. These are the need for quantitative data grading scores, and the need for scoring mechanisms that can be run in automated fashion and at scale. The Real World Data Score (RWDS) rates the overall quality and completeness of a RWD source across a range of customizable metrics. The Fitness Quotient (FitQ) grades how well a specific data source fits a specific RWE query. In concert, these tools give producers and consumers of RWE evidence to assess the quality of the underlying RWD.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MMFP-Tableau: Enabling Precision Mitochondrial Medicine through Integration, Visualization, and Analytics of Clinical and Research Health System Electronic Data 95%
- Understanding Data Differences across the ENACT Federated Research Network 94%
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- EHR-QC: A streamlined pipeline for automated electronic health records standardisation and preprocessing to predict clinical outcomes 95%
- Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance 94%
- Biomedical Text Normalization through Generative Modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.