The cost of sleeping sickness vector control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Snijders, R.; Shaw, A. P. M.; Selby, R.; Tirados, I.; Bessel, P. R.; Fukinsia, A.; Miaka, E.; Tediosi, F.; Hasker, E.; Antillon, M.
Show abstract
Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a neglected tropical disease caused by a parasite transmitted by tsetse flies, once inflicted over 30,000 annual cases and resulted in half a million deaths in the late twentieth century. An international gHAT control program has reduced cases to under 1,000 annually, encouraging the World Health Organization to target the elimination of gHAT transmission by 2030. This requires adopting innovative disease control approaches in foci where transmission persists. Since the last decade, case detection and treatment, the mainstay of controlling the disease, is supplemented by vector control using Tiny Targets, small insecticide-treated screens, which attract and kill tsetse. The advantages of Tiny Targets lie in their relatively low cost, easy deployment, and effectiveness. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), bearing 65% of the 799 gHAT cases reported globally in 2022, introduced Tiny Targets in 2015. This study estimates the annual cost of vector control using Tiny Targets in a health district in the DRC and identifies the main cost drivers. Economic and financial costs, collected from the providers perspective, were used to estimate the average cost of tsetse control expressed as cost (i) per target used, (ii) per target deployed, (iii) linear kilometre of river controlled, and (iv) square kilometres protected by vector control. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on key parameters for results robustness. The estimated annual economic cost for protecting an area of 1,925 km{superscript 2} was 120,000 USD. This translates to 5.3 USD per target used each year, 11 USD per target deployed in the field, 573 USD per linear km treated, and 62 USD per km{superscript 2} protected. These costs in the DRC are comparable to those in other countries. The study provides valuable information for practitioners and policymakers aiding them in making rational, evidence-based decisions regarding cost-effective strategies to control gHAT. Author SummaryIn the fight against Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a devastating disease transmitted by tsetse flies, significant progress has been made through international efforts. Despite the annual cases being reduced to under 1,000, the World Health Organization aims to eliminate gHAT transmission by 2030. A key component of this strategy involves innovative approaches, such as the use of Tiny Targets - small, cost-effective, insecticide-treated screens that attract and kill tsetse flies. This study focuses on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which bears a substantial burden of gHAT cases, estimating the annual cost of vector control using Tiny Targets in a specific health district. The analysis, conducted from the providers perspective, reveals an annual economic cost of 120,000 USD for protecting a 1,925 km{superscript 2} area. This translates to 5.3 USD per target used, 11 USD per target deployed, 573 USD per linear km treated, and 62 USD per km{superscript 2} protected. These findings, comparable to costs in other countries, offer valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers, guiding evidence-based decisions on cost-effective strategies for gHAT control.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards the sustainable elimination of human African trypanosomiasis in Côte d’Ivoire using an integrated approach 97%
- Cost-effectiveness of vector control strategies for supplementing mass drug administration for eliminating lymphatic filariasis in India 97%
- A modelling assessment of short- and medium-term risks of programme interruptions for gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in the DRC 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying hidden Zika hotspots in Pernambuco, Brazil: A spatial analysis 94%
- Disruptions to schistosomiasis programmes due to COVID-19: an analysis of potential impact and mitigation strategies 94%
- Predicting the impact of disruptions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and possible mitigation strategies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of four years of annually repeated indoor residual spraying (IRS) with Actellic 300CS on routinely reported malaria cases in an agricultural setting in Malawi 95%
- Community access to rectal artesunate for malaria (CARAMAL): a large-scale observational implementation study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria and Uganda 95%
- Key findings and recommendations from assessment of Cambodia's national malaria surveillance system 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of surveillance data for planning for dengue elimination in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a scenario tree modelling approach 95%
- Malaria trends in districts that were targeted and not-targeted for seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children under five years of age in Guinea, 2014 - 2021 93%
- Assessing mpox knowledge and sexual behaviours within high-risk populations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating post-validation surveillance of lymphatic filariasis with the WHO STEPwise approach to non-communicable disease risk factor surveillance in Niue, a study protocol 96%
- Evaluation of a Digital Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool for Malaria Vector Control: Three Country Mixed Methods Pilot Study 95%
- Modelling the impact of larviciding as a supplementary malaria vector control intervention in rural south-eastern Tanzania: A district-level simulation study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.