Back

Treadmill Exercise Stress Echocardiography Exposes Impaired Left Ventricular Function in Patients Recovering from Hospitalization with COVID-19 Without Overt Myocarditis Versus Historical Controls

Goldstein, R. E.; Hulten, E.; Arnold, T. B.; Thomas, V. M.; Heroy, A.; Walker, E. N.; Fox, K.; Lee, H.; Libbus, J.; Marcos, B.; Hood, M. N.; Harrell, T. E.; Haigney, M. C.

2024-02-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.02.01.24302037
Show abstract

BackgroundUsual clinical testing rarely reveals cardiac abnormalities persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19. Such testing may overlook residual changes responsible for increased adverse cardiac events post-discharge. MethodsTo further elucidate long-term status, we performed exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in 15 patients age 30-63 without myocarditis 3 to 31 months after hospital discharge. We compared patient outcomes to published data in healthy comparisons (HC) exercising according to the same protocol. ResultsPatients treadmill exercise (Bruce protocol), averaging 8.2 min, was halted by dyspnea or fatigue. Pre-stress baselines in recovering patients (RP) matched HC except for higher heart rate: mean 81 bpm for RP and 63 for HC (p<0.0001). At peak stress, RP had significantly lower mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (67% vs 73%, p<0.0017) and higher peak early mitral inflow velocity/early mitral annular velocity (E/e, 9.1 vs 6.6, p<0.006) compared with HC performing equal exercise (8.5 min). Thus, when stressed, patients without known cardiac impairment showed modest but consistently diminished systolic contractile function and diastolic LV compliance during recovery vs HC. Peak HR during stress was significantly elevated in RP vs HC; peak SBP also trended higher. Average pulmonary artery systolic pressures among RP remained normal. ConclusionsOur measurements during ESE uniquely identified residual abnormality in cardiac contractile function not evident in the unstressed condition. This finding exposes a previously-unrecognized residual influence of COVID-19, possibly related to underlying autonomic dysfunction, microvascular disease, or diffuse interstitial changes after subclinical myocarditis; it may have long-term implications for clinical management and later prognosis. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVENew Findings (relative to a historical comparison group) O_LISymptom-limited treadmill exercise 3-31 months after hospitalization with COVID-19 without overt myocarditis elicited a lesser rise in left ventricular ejection fraction than seen in similar subjects with no exposure to COVID-19. C_LIO_LIThe same symptom-limited exercise in these patients revealed evidence of diminished left ventricular diastolic function relative to subjects with no exposure to COVID-19. C_LIO_LIThese distinctive differences in left ventricular function were observed although overall exercise capacity was the same as in the uninfected comparison group. C_LI Clinical Implications O_LIPrior hospitalization with COVID-19 even in the absence of overt myocarditis was often associated with a modest but consistent decrement in left ventricular systolic contraction and diastolic relaxation; these functional abnormalities were evident after peak treadmill exercise stress despite lack of distinctive difference in contractile parameters at rest. C_LIO_LIPatients recovering after hospitalization with COVID-19 may benefit from sustained observation of their cardiovascular status and adjustment of their exercise requirements appropriate to individual cardiovascular capabilities. C_LIO_LITreadmill stress testing with echocardiography uniquely identifies potentially important differences in the cardiovascular function of patients recovering after hospitalization with COVID-19. C_LI

Matching journals

1
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 0.4%
42× avg
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 25%
1.5× avg
4
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 0.9%
30× avg
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
21× avg
6
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
75× avg
7
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.6%
31× avg
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
32× avg
9
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
60× avg
10
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.4%
40× avg
11
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
22× avg
12
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
21× avg
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
18× avg
14
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 90%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
16
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
6.9× avg
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 137 published papers
Top 8%
3.6× avg
18
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
8.2× avg
19
Journal of Internal Medicine
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.3%
21× avg
20
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
5.9× avg
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 16%
0.8%
22
EBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
7.5× avg
23
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
5.0× avg
24
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 54%
0.7%
25
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 22%
0.7%