Back

Family Leaders Communicate Risk During Cascade Screening after Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young

Dellefave-Castillo, L. M.; Hinkamp, F.; Shah, L.; Scherr, C. L.; Young, J.; Webster, G.; Duquette, D.

2024-02-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.02.01.24302009 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionRelatives of a victim of sudden cardiac death in the young (SCDY) may be at risk for hereditary cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias. Family leaders are often responsible for communicating risk to surviving family at a difficult time. PurposeExplore barriers and facilitators to communication about cascade screening in families who have lost a family member to SCDY MethodsSemi-structured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with family members of a SCDY decedent. Participants were recruited from the Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndrome advocacy group. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using conventional content analysis. ResultsFive categories were identified from the interviews: 1. Participants understood fundamental risks but the clinical variability in arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy was difficult to interpret and convey; 2. Family leaders felt some family disregarded risk information; 3. Grief interfered with communication; 4. Communication aids were insufficient stand-alone interventions; 5. Families advocated for a "genetic family navigator". ConclusionThe five categories provide practical strategies to improve clinical care and communication for families after a SCDY and emphasize the need for genetic family navigators to facilitate cascade screening. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=80 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24302009v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@25844aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11029d6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2ad67dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@67bb17_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.